A low effort comparison of different http-clients, mostly comparing axum averhead, and uring efficiency
when fitted into hyper.
axum carries functionally no overhead over a pure hyper implementation.
My adaptation of tokio-uring into hyper has the same performance characteristics as
both of the above, when running single-threaded (the tokio-uring runtime is only single threaded as far
as I can tell). Seem to have slightly worse outliers, but I haven't measured percentiles yet.