Mechanism-Labs/MetaAnalysis-of-Alternative-Consensus-Protocols
This paper presents the first systematization of knowledge within these major blockchain protocols, understanding the common challenges and solutions, and providing a formal structure within which to compare them. We break down these protocols by network, adversarial, and economic model, deeply understanding the common challenges of choosing proposers and committees, propogation, and finality.
TeX
Stargazers
- AntoineRondelet
- arnavvohra
- asonninoLondon, U.K.
- banteg@yearn
- bonedaddy@sol-farm
- colin-axnerstockholm
- cyborgshead@cybercongress
- davidp94
- decanusDialectic / Project Blanc
- DennisBPeterson
- domwoe@dfinity
- drhusSão Paulo
- edudemyEdudemy.org
- eos21SatCom
- evbotsUnited States
- FishbiscuitSingapore
- gakonst@paradigmxyz
- glambethAnn Arbor, MI
- hleb-albauLisbon,Portugal
- hrishikeshio
- jonspock
- jpantunesStork & Crow B.V.
- karlfloersch
- L-KovTucson, Arizona
- lounleeSeoul, Korea
- luca590@Eulith
- mfahampshire@nymtech @terra0project
- residaAtlanta, GA
- ricburton@balance-io
- sidrmsh
- siman@DappForce
- taoeffectTao Effect, okTurtles
- tuxcanfly@bcoin-org @handshake-org
- tynesop labs @ optimism
- wpank@AhaniaCapital
- zkotichaOpyn