MishaKav/jest-coverage-comment
Comments a pull request or commit with the jest code coverage badge, full report and tests summary
TypeScriptMIT
Issues
- 1
Use Release using Floating Tag
#100 opened by chandanpg - 1
Not reading my code coverage report files
#99 opened by ChrisMBarr - 3
- 3
why line coverage is displayed as a badge?
#90 opened by aviralpostman - 2
- 1
- 1
Is there a way to combine the `coverage.txt` file if I run my tests in multiple parallel containers?
#94 opened by aviralpostman - 3
- 3
[Feature] Dynamic multi line comment
#91 opened by Tallyb - 0
- 2
The link of missing line doesn't work properly with Jest option --changedSince
#89 opened by vhoang1102 - 3
Report only changed files not working
#88 opened by SirPhemmiey - 13
Dynamic multiple-files issue
#87 opened by SirPhemmiey - 2
dynamic multiple-files
#72 opened by ngonzalezromero - 2
Write comment to a PR for push action.
#74 opened by jangot - 4
badge doesn't appear
#84 opened by jhonjtoloza - 1
Add support to coverage-final.json
#82 opened by bwrutter - 2
Update Node 16 -> 20
#79 opened by kagankan - 2
- 1
Difference in coverage
#75 opened by ahrybouskaja-easyjet - 9
When create-new-comment is false, Report-only-changed-files should report the coverage for all files changed in the PR, not just the ones in the most recent commit
#18 opened by sghsri - 4
multiple-files seems not working
#73 opened by Chongfuyu - 2
- 5
Does not create output / comment
#70 opened by mindrunner - 2
Cant get outputs when using mono-repo functionality & pull_request_review action trigger
#71 opened by JacobStenson1 - 6
Is there any way to have the coverage table be generated from the outputFile (jest --json --outputFIle=results.json)?
#15 opened by sghsri - 4
Using multiple-files in a monorepo setup logs a missing summary error in annotations
#66 opened by 8lane - 12
Uncovered line link pointing to invalid page
#57 opened by TobiasGoetz - 1
Parse summary report. Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'lines')
#60 opened by arthurgeron-work - 4
Question: Can this work with a monorepo?
#21 opened by uglow - 0
Action fail on workflow_dispatch event
#37 opened by MishaKav - 1
Redundancy Summary table
#36 opened by blankhat1610 - 10
Adding Feature: Multiple coverage test
#33 opened by blankhat1610 - 2
- 2
- 6
- 3
Links to files contain double "//" and thus not work in the details report when using istanbul
#22 opened by sandinosaso - 2
Ability to have the coverage table only show coverage information for the files that changed in the PR.
#14 opened by sghsri - 0
- 0
- 4
Report table is void
#7 opened by DavidBernal