CR vs CR LF problem with Lua?
drawkula opened this issue · 4 comments
drawkula commented
CP/M 2.2 Emulator v5.7 by Marcelo Dantas
Built Oct 3 2022 - 00:05:13
with Lua scripting support
-----------------------------------------
CCP : INTERNAL v2.6 CCP Address: 0xf400
A0>dir *.lua
A: BDOS LUA | HELLO LUA | LUAINFO LUA
A0>luainfo
RunCPM System Information v1.0.lua
RunCPM Version 5.7 running on Posix
CCP is Internal Version 2.6
CCP loads at address F400h
BDOS is at address FC00h
BIOS is at address FE00h
64256 bytes available for applications
A0>█
I typically don't even use Lua, just wanted to test what else except .COM
and .SUB
might be executable without adding the extension...
MockbaTheBorg commented
I am not observing this. Is this a Linux machine? Terminal?
It is using whatever Lua uses for (CR)LF.
Built Oct 3 2022 - 08:18:18
with Lua scripting support
-----------------------------------------
CCP : INTERNAL v2.6 CCP Address: 0xe400
RunCPM Version 5.7 (CP/M 2.2 60K)
A0>dir *.lua
A: BDOS LUA | HELLO LUA | LUAINFO LUA
A0>luainfo
RunCPM System Information v1.0.lua
RunCPM Version 5.7 running on Windows
CCP is Internal Version 2.6
CCP loads at address E400h
BDOS is at address EC00h
BIOS is at address FE00h
60160 bytes available for applications
A0>```
MockbaTheBorg commented
I have tested in a few different boards here. I think it is a case of WAD.
drawkula commented
I see that effect on Debian11/AMD64 in Xterm and in text-only consoles.
drawkula commented
In the same Xterm: SURPRISE!!!
CP/M 2.2 Emulator v5.5 by Marcelo Dantas
Built Oct 3 2022 - 14:14:12
with Lua scripting support
-----------------------------------------
CCP : INTERNAL v2.3 CCP Address: 0xe400
RunCPM Version 5.5 (CP/M 2.2 60K)
A0>luainfo
RunCPM System Information v1.0.lua
RunCPM Version 5.5 running on Posix
CCP is Internal Version 2.3
CCP loads at address E400h
BDOS is at address EC00h
BIOS is at address FE00h
60160 bytes available for applications
A0>█
Edit:
It worked as expected before.
+ I don't need Lua.
==============================
= I'll disable it again.
_o/"