make release with exposure of organism class
Opened this issue · 7 comments
wdduncan commented
matentzn commented
Unfortunately there still seem to be problems with the exposure class. Unfortunately also these problems are vocalised on various private chats.
wdduncan commented
I thought the PR was approved and merged b/c we (the COB collective) had decided that the exposure to organism class was deemed adequate.
Am I mistaken?
matentzn commented
I think it's fine, but give it a week for the dust to settle. I think the word "entity" in the definition is causing concern people make mistake the class for being restricted to exposure to physical entities..
bpeters42 commented
I don't think I am part of any private chat regarding this (if I am someone
please link me to it). I suspect Bill isn't either. So it would be quite
helpful if any problems that lead people to object to the minimal
compromise we have so far will be added to the public discussion.
- Bjoern
…On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:35 PM Nico Matentzoglu ***@***.***> wrote:
Unfortunately there still seem to be problems with the exposure class.
Unfortunately also these problems are vocalised on various private chats.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#210 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJX2IXASSM5PPYVVXHYXNDVZ2F6ZANCNFSM5656GPQA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Bjoern Peters
Professor
La Jolla Institute for Immunology
9420 Athena Circle
La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
Tel: 858/752-6914
Fax: 858/752-6987
http://www.liai.org/pages/faculty-peters
wdduncan commented
@bpeters42 No, I am not part of such conversations :(
It would be great if we can make a release so that I close the related RO issue.
matentzn commented
Forget my comment. Since no one spoke up in public, just move forward now..