Issues
- 1
Review notes: Version 3.0 OpenChain ISO/IEC 5230:2024 (proposed) - DRAFT
#70 opened by andreaskotulla - 1
[Agenda/Minutes]
#73 opened by Hawthorne001 - 2
- 13
- 11
- 9
Scope - for next iteration
#33 opened by andrewjskatz - 2
- 1
Content of '2.2 Effectively Resourced'
#57 opened by MarcelScholze - 5
[Improvement] Should we revisit contribution - pointers to elsewhere or more than generic policy request?
#62 opened by shanecoughlan - 4
[Improvement] Change review period to 12 months to align with ISO 17021 for certification of management systems
#69 opened by shanecoughlan - 1
[Improvement] Alignment with Security Spec 2.0 draft based on call 2023-10-17
#68 opened by shanecoughlan - 2
Objectives (1.3 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.1)
#58 opened by MarcelScholze - 1
Definitions: Program
#54 opened by MarcelScholze - 3
- 14
Consider adding definition of 'bill of materials' - for consideration in next iteration
#35 opened by andrewjskatz - 3
- 5
- 4
reasonable commercial efforts
#50 opened by HansMKern - 4
Definitions: Supplied Software
#55 opened by MarcelScholze - 2
Redundancy 1.1.2 vs. 1.3
#59 opened by MarcelScholze - 2
Pull-request capable format
#49 opened by HansMKern - 3
- 4
v2.1 § 3.2.1.1 - assist in resolving compliance issues quickly by sending contact info to orgs
#44 opened by ossguy - 2
- 1
v2.1 § 3.3.2 - clarify "modified open source" term to mitigate common compliance error
#45 opened by ossguy - 2
Numbering
#39 opened by andrewjskatz - 4
- 6
- 1
mention of "copyleft"
#48 opened by zvr - 6
- 3
"Compliance Artifacts"
#36 opened by andrewjskatz - 1
strange capitalization
#47 opened by zvr - 3
2.7 broaden intent of SPDX
#42 opened by iamwillbar - 1
A few typos
#37 opened by andrewjskatz - 3
Software Staff vs Program participant
#30 opened by MarkGisi - 3
- 5
- 2
competence for each program participant record
#29 opened by MarkGisi - 2
enforcing 18 month conformance requirement
#32 opened by MarkGisi - 0
- 0
“Identified Licenses”’ in section 1.5
#31 opened by MarkGisi - 0
- 1
URL for SPDX?
#26 opened by MarkGisi - 1
- 0
no longer any explicit requirement to know open source licensing (Jonas Öberg)
#20 opened by MarkGisi - 1
- 2
- 2
Fix spelling mistake `inquires`
#18 opened by tsteenbe - 3
Add to spec intro that understanding open source licensing is prerequisite to understanding the spec
#16 opened by MarkGisi - 2
Consider performing a major rewrite of the spec Introduction to include more inspiration and sense of purpose
#17 opened by MarkGisi