/bioinf545

ATAC-seq lab for BIOINF545

Primary LanguageShell

BIOINF545 ATAC-seq Lab

Introduction

We're going to work through a basic ATAC-seq data analysis pipeline. We'll check the quality of the assay data, clean it up, map it to a reference genome, call peaks on the aligned reads, and create a browser track for the UCSC Genome Browser. We'll also predict the locations of bound transcription factors.

The commands you'll run will be set in code blocks with a gray background, like this:

echo "This is a command."
echo "This is another command."

To run each command, copy the entire line and paste it into a shell window on the class workstation.

Setting up your workspace

Log into Great Lakes and start up an interactive job session.

Open up a terminal session and create a working directory under your home directory on Great Lakes by copying and pasting the commands below:

salloc --account=bioinf545w24_class --partition=standard --time=02:00:00 --ntasks=1 --cpus-per-task=2 --nodes=1 --mem=8GB
user=`whoami`
echo $user
export LAB_DIR=/nfs/turbo/dcmb-class/bioinf545/sec001/${user}/bf545-atac-seq
mkdir -p $LAB_DIR && cd $LAB_DIR

Set a few environment variables to reduce typing later:

export LAB_DATA="/nfs/turbo/dcmb-class/bioinf545/shared/atac-seq-lab"
export REF_DIR=${LAB_DATA}/data
export REF=hg19
export PICARD_JAR="${LAB_DATA}/bin/picard.jar"
export R_LIBS_SITE=${LAB_DATA}/R/%p/%v

Make sure we're running the right versions of the tools:

export PATH=${LAB_DATA}/bin:${LAB_DATA}/ve/bin:$PATH

Retrieval of sequence data

Whether trying to replicate published results or working with your own data, it's essential to know how high-throughput sequence data was produced. Paired-end data is processed differently than single-ended, and many of the tools we use are sensitive to details like read length and reference genome size.

We're going to work with data from the original ATAC-seq paper by Buenrostro et al.:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3959825/

We don't have time to download and analyze the entire sample during lab, so we're going to start with a subset in the following FASTQ files:

  • SRR891268.1.fq.gz -- contains the first reads of the pairs
  • SRR891268.2.fq.gz -- contains the second reads of the pairs

They contain reads from sample SRR891268 that aligned (mostly) to chromosome 1.

Copy them from the class data directory to your working directory:

cp ${LAB_DATA}/data/*.gz ${LAB_DIR}
cp ${LAB_DATA}/data/*.meme ${LAB_DIR}

Now list your directory contents to make sure the files are there:

ls -lFh

You should see files that look like this:

# NOTE: do not copy/paste this block. This is only an example of output.
total 21M
-r--r--r--. 1 scjp users  19M Mar 23 11:50 chr20.fa.gz
-r--r--r--. 1 scjp users  684 Mar 23 11:50 CTCF_known2.meme
-r--r--r--. 1 scjp users 730K Mar 23 11:50 NA12878.CTCF_known2.chr1.bed.gz
-r--r--r--. 1 scjp users  63K Mar 23 11:50 NA12878.CTCF_known2.scores.chr1.gz
-r--r--r--. 1 scjp users 496K Mar 23 11:50 SRR891268.1.fq.gz
-r--r--r--. 1 scjp users 512K Mar 23 11:50 SRR891268.2.fq.gz

If you're curious about how to retrieve published sequence data, read on, otherwise skip to Basic quality checking with FastQC.

The authors submitted their data to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive. In footnotes under the paper's methods section, they provide a link:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE47753

Our data comes from the first sample:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM1155957

From that page, we know the sample was extracted from 50,000 human lymphoblastoid cells from the GM12878 line. The library was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000, producing paired-end reads.

The sample page also links to the SRA record:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?term=SRX298000

The run ID at the bottom of the page, SRR891268, is what you need to download the data. You also need to have the NCBI SRA tools installed, so you can use fastq-dump:

You do not need to do this step for the lab.

fastq-dump --gzip --split-files SRR891268

The --split-files argument is used to download into two files, one containing the first read of the pairs, and the other containing the second reads (mates). Tools used later in the pipeline often use the presence of the mate file to determine whether they're processing paired end data.

Basic quality checking with FastQC

FastQC performs some basic quality control checks on raw sequence data. To check the ATAC-seq reads, run:

module load Bioinformatics
module load Bioinformatics  gcc/10.3.0-k2osx5y
module load fastqc
fastqc SRR891268.1.fq.gz

When it completes, copy the file to your local maching and open the HTML report in a web browser. You can execute a command similar to this from your own Desktop directory: Note to substitute USERNAME with your own user name.

scp username@greatlakes.arc-ts.umich.edu:/nfs/turbo/dcmb-class/bioinf545/sec001/USERNAME/bf545-atac-seq/SRR891268.1_fastqc.html .

Note the report section on per-base content. Do you think TN5 has integration bias?

Don't worry about the GC content. We're using too little data to get a reliable curve.

Note the section on adapter contamination. How does this look? Is it expected?

When you're done reviewing, exit the browser. In real work you'd of course check both read 1 and 2 files, but in the interest of time we'll move on.

Trimming adapter sequence from reads

For ATAC-seq data, we trim adapter sequence using Jason Buenrostro's approach: try to align the paired-end reads to each other, and if that can be done with a Levenshtein edit distance of one or less, chop off any sequence outside the alignment. The nice thing about this technique is that you don't need to know which adapter sequences were used. Other tools generally need to be told, or can sometimes guess, using a list of known adapters. The command line:

module load python
module load atactk
trim_adapters SRR891268.1.fq.gz SRR891268.2.fq.gz

There may be an error message and it's fine. When it's done, compare the first few reads in the original and trimmed files of first reads:

zdiff -u SRR891268.1.fq.gz SRR891268.1.trimmed.fastq.gz | less

You should see something like this, where the lines marked with + and - in the left margin differ. The - lines are the original versions of the reads or quality lines, and the + lines are trimmed. (Note that there are also comment lines in the FASTQ files that start with + -- ignore those.)

--- /dev/fd/5   2017-03-21 14:23:27.830504681 -0400
+++ -   2017-03-21 14:23:27.833919209 -0400
@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@
 +SRR891268.38259 HWI-ST281:266:C1LTTACXX:1:1101:14488:7554 length=50
 CCCFFFFFGHHHHJJJJJJJJJJJJIJ@GIHIHJJJBEEHBDFFEEDDDB
 @SRR891268.38633 HWI-ST281:266:C1LTTACXX:1:1101:18609:7598 length=50
-TTTCTCGTGTTACATCGCGCCATCATTGGTATATGGCTGTCTCTTATACA
+TTTCTCGTGTTACATCGCGCCATCATTGGTATATGG
 +SRR891268.38633 HWI-ST281:266:C1LTTACXX:1:1101:18609:7598 length=50
-CCCFFFFFHHHHHJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJGHIJJJJJJJJJJJJJJIJJJ
+CCCFFFFFHHHHHJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJGHIJJJJ
 @SRR891268.43221 HWI-ST281:266:C1LTTACXX:1:1101:12315:8330 length=50
 GGGCCGGGCGGTCCCTTTAACGGCGCGGCCCGAGGGGCGCAGGCGGGAGG
 +SRR891268.43221 HWI-ST281:266:C1LTTACXX:1:1101:12315:8330 length=50

You can exit from the less program by pressing q.

Aligning the trimmed reads to a reference genome

With the adapter cleanup complete, we can finally align the reads to a reference genome and see where the ATAC-seq transpositions happened. Note this is a long command. Make sure to copy the entire line.

module load bwa
module load samtools
bwa mem -t 4 -I 200,200,5000 ${REF_DIR}/${REF} SRR891268.1.trimmed.fastq.gz SRR891268.2.trimmed.fastq.gz | samtools sort -@ 4 -O bam -T SRR891268.tmp -o SRR891268.bam -

We specify bwa's mem algorithm, and give it both files of paired-end reads. The mem algorithm is the latest, and recommended for any reads longer than 70bp. It also requires just one step, which is why we're using it with the 50bp reads in this lab, but if you're ever working with short reads, you'll probably want to at least try the older "backtrack" algorithm (invoked with bwa aln ) for each file of reads, add the separate bwa sampe step to combine the results for each pair, and compare to the bwa mem alignments.

We also pipe bwa's output through samtools sort to create the final BAM file. You'll see a lot of piping in bioinformatics analyses on Linux. It's generally more efficient, since each command doesn't have to write its output to disk. Sometimes it is worth preserving the output of big tasks, though, if you know you'll be feeding it to multiple downstream processes.

The -O bam argument to samtools sort requests BAM output, the -T option specifies the basis for the temporary files it creates while sorting, -o names the output file, and - specifies that the input will come from standard input -- the pipe into which bwa sends its output. You may also see standard input specified as /dev/stdin, usually when a program doesn't recognize -; /dev/stdin just looks like a regular file to them.

The -I 200,200,5000 option tells BWA to assume the insert size distribution has: mean=200bp, SD=200bp, max=5000bp. The default BWA behavior is to calculate insert size metrics from the first batch of reads it sees. If your input fastq is pre- sorted (perhaps from a previous analysis) such that reads from peaks are nearby you could observe an abundance of small fragment sizes in the intitial read batch used to estimate the insert sizes. These skewed small insert size summary statistics are then used by BWA to calculate read mapping qualities and could result in penalities to longer insert fragments. By forcing the expected insert size summary statistics with the -I option, we can correct for such a potential bias against longer fragments.

Finally, note the -t 4 option: we're telling bwa to use four processing threads to align the reads faster. We also tell samtools to use four threads for sorting and compressing with the -@ 4 option.

On Linux, you can see how many processors are available with the lscpu command. Picking the right number of threads can be tricky. Too few and your analysis takes longer than it should, but too many and it could take even longer, as the machine struggles to balance all the work. You need to know how busy the machine is, and also how well a program can use multiple processors; some don't scale well, so there's a point of diminishing returns, after which you're wasting processors and not getting your results any sooner.

The combination of bwa and samtools is pretty efficient. Running the above command took about 24 seconds with one thread, and only six seconds with four. That's on this tiny sample data; with typical genomic analyses, the difference can be many hours. But running with eight threads only shaved another second and a half from the run time, and even with 16 threads, it still took four seconds.

When you have a lot of data to align, it can be more efficient to run multiple bwa commands concurrently, with a few threads each, than to run one at a time with a large number of threads.

Sifting the aligned reads

Not all reads map well. We'll use bwa's annotations to sift out the good ones for subsequent analysis.

Then we'll mark duplicate alignments. Duplication is a complicated assessment: duplicate reads can come from the same original DNA fragment, or they can be PCR or optical artifacts of the library prep or sequencing process. The documentation for the tool we'll use, Picard, from the Broad Institute, explains how it identifies duplicates.

Here's the command:

java -Xmx8g -jar ${PICARD_JAR} MarkDuplicates I=SRR891268.bam O=SRR891268.md.bam ASSUME_SORTED=true METRICS_FILE=SRR891268.markdup.metrics VALIDATION_STRINGENCY=LENIENT

The output will be a BAM file containing all of bwa's output, with duplicate reads marked. You could also just have Picard remove them, if you have no need for them later in the pipeline.

Now we need to index the BAM file with duplicates marked:

samtools index SRR891268.md.bam

Finally, we'll sift out the good alignments -- reads that mapped uniquely, with good quality, to autosomal references:

export CHROMOSOMES=$(samtools view -H SRR891268.md.bam | grep '^@SQ' | cut -f 2 | grep -v -e _ -e chrM -e chrX -e chrY -e 'VN:' | sed 's/SN://' | xargs echo); samtools view -b -h -f 3 -F 4 -F 8 -F 256 -F 1024 -F 2048 -q 30 SRR891268.md.bam $CHROMOSOMES > SRR891268.pruned.bam

Yes, really. You'll see complicated commands strung together like this all the time. If it helps, this is more complex than average.

The first bit, before the semicolon, creates an environment variable CHROMOSOMES to hold a list of autosomal references obtained from the header of the BAM file:

export CHROMOSOMES=$(samtools view -H SRR891268.md.bam | grep '^@SQ' | cut -f 2 | grep -v -e _ -e chrM -e chrX -e chrY -e 'VN:' | sed 's/SN://' | xargs echo);

That environment variable is used in the last argument to the `samtools view command to only retrieve reads that aligned to those references:

samtools view -b -h -f 3 -F 4 -F 8 -F 256 -F 1024 -F 2048 -q 30 SRR891268.md.bam $CHROMOSOMES

As for the rest of the arguments:

  • -b: requests BAM output
  • -h: requests that the header from the input BAM file be included

The next few use SAM flags to filter alignments. There's a detailed specification for SAM files, which describes the flags that tools can use to annotate aligned reads.

  • -f 3: only include alignments marked with the SAM flag 3, which means "properly paired and mapped"
  • -F 4: exclude aligned reads with flag 4: the read itself did not map
  • -F 8: exclude aligned reads with flag 8: their mates did not map
  • -F 256: exclude alignments with flag 256, which means that bwa mapped the read to multiple places in the reference genome, and this alignment is not the best
  • -F 1024: exclude alignments marked with SAM flag 1024, which indicates that the read is an optical or PCR duplicate (this flag would be set by Picard)
  • -F 2048: exclude alignments marked with SAM flag 2048, indicating chimeric alignments, where bwa decided that parts of the read mapped to different regions in the genome. These records are the individual aligned segments of the read. They usually indicate structural variation. We're not going to base peak calls on them.

Finally, we use a basic quality filter, -q 30, to request high mapping-quality alignments.

Calling peaks on the aligned reads

We'll use MACS2 to "call peaks" in the aligned reads -- we're looking for regions with lots of transposition events, which indicate open chromatin. First we need to convert the BAM file to a BED file, then run MACS2.

module load bedtools2
bedtools bamtobed -i SRR891268.pruned.bam | sort -k1,1 -k2,2n > SRR891268.pruned.bed 
module load py-macs2/2.2.4-4abp2hm
macs2 callpeak -t SRR891268.pruned.bed -f BED -n SRR891268.broad -g hs -q 0.05 --nomodel --shift -100 --extsize 200 -B --broad --keep-dup all

The arguments are:

  • -t: the "treatment" file -- the input, which is the sifted BAM file from the last step
  • -F: specifies the input file format, in this case BED
  • -n: the name of the experiment, which is used to name files
  • -g: the genome's mappable size; 'hs' is an alias for the human genome's mappable size
  • -q: the false discovery rate cutoff for significant regions (peaks)
  • --nomodel, --shift, and --extsize: MACS2 was designed for ChIP-seq data, so we're telling it not to use its built-in model, but to extend and shift reads in a way appropriate for ATAC-seq.
  • -B: Create bedGraph files we'll use to create a browser track.
  • --broad: request that adjacent enriched regions be combined into broad regions
  • --keep-dup: specified how many reads that have the same start site to keep. Since we already used Picard to identify duplicates and samtools to filter them out, any remaining read start sites should be retained. So we specify all here.

Creating a browser track so we can look at the peaks in the UCSC Genome Browser

We're going to use a prefab browser track that contains peaks called on the entire data, not the subset we're working with in the lab, but this is how you would create a track for the called peaks:

wget http://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/admin/exe/linux.x86_64/bedGraphToBigWig
chmod 775 bedGraphToBigWig
LC_COLLATE=C sort -k1,1 -k2,2n SRR891268.broad_treat_pileup.bdg > SRR891268.broad_treat_pileup.sorted.bdg
./bedGraphToBigWig SRR891268.broad_treat_pileup.sorted.bdg ${REF_DIR}/${REF}.chrom_sizes SRR891268.broad_peaks.bw

First open a web browser and navigate to the following custom browser URL: https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?hgS_doOtherUser=submit&hgS_otherUserName=Scjparker&hgS_otherUserSessionName=bf545%2DATAC%2Dseq

This should open to the GCK locus. GCK is an islet-specific gene that is not "on" in GM12878 cells.

Now scroll down and click on "add custom tracks" and then in the "Paste URL or data" box, paste the following track:

track type=bigWig name="GM12878 ATAC-seq peaks" description="GM12878 ATAC-seq peaks" visibility=full color=255,128,0 alwaysZero=on maxHeightPixels=50:50:50 windowingFunction=mean smoothingWindow=3 bigDataUrl=https://theparkerlab.med.umich.edu/gb/tracks/bioinf545/gm12878.broad_treat_pileup.bw

Then click on "submit", then click "go to first annotation" to return to the GCK locus now with GM12878 ATAC-seq data. How does the GM12878 chromatin accessibility look at GCK? At the two flanking genes, POLD2 and YKT6? Can you see the open chromatin promoter regions?

Predicting transcription factor binding footprints

One of the questions that ATAC-seq helps answer is, "Where might transcription factor binding be happening in interesting cell types?" If we can correlate regions of open chromatin revealed by ATAC-seq with predicted transcription factor (TF) binding sites, we can identify regions that are potentially bound in a cell.

Transcription factors usually bind to specific sequence motifs, which can be described with a position weight matrix (PWM). We can use these PWMs to search the genome for all of a transcription factor's potential binding sites. For this, we use a program called FIMO from the MEME Suite (http://meme-suite.org/doc/fimo.html). FIMO builds a file of motif locations scored according to their PWM match.

As input, FIMO needs a FASTA file containing the reference in which you want to find motifs, a MEME-format file describing motifs, and optionally a background file containing the background nucleotide frequencies in the reference. In the interest of time, we're going to use chromosome 20 to illustrate FIMO usage.

To create the background file, run fasta-get-markov:

zcat chr20.fa.gz | fasta-get-markov /dev/stdin chr20.bg

To scan the CTCF motif across chr20 and find sequence matches:

zcat chr20.fa.gz | fimo -bgfile chr20.bg CTCF_known2.meme /dev/stdin

FIMO's output goes into a fimo_out dir. The motifs are in a GFF file, which you can convert to BED format with:

gff2bed < fimo_out/fimo.gff | awk 'BEGIN {IFS="\t"; OFS="\t";} {print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6}' | gzip > NA12878.CTCF_known2.chr20.bed.gz

For TF footprinting, we use a program called CENTIPEDE (http://centipede.uchicago.edu/), which combines binding site coordinates and experimental data showing open chromatin to calculate the probability that a transcription factor is present at a candidate binding site.

To present the experimental data to CENTIPEDE, we've written a script called make_cut_matrix to count ATAC-seq transposition events around putative binding sites. Its input is an indexed BAM file (we'll have to make sure to index the pruned BAM file we just created) and the BED file of binding site motifs found by FIMO. Its output is a matrix which can be passed to CENTIPEDE along with the BED file of binding site motifs found by FIMO. Here's how to run it, using FIMO results from chromosome 1:

samtools index SRR891268.pruned.bam
make_cut_matrix -v -d -p 2 -f 3 -F 4 -F 8 -q 30 SRR891268.pruned.bam NA12878.CTCF_known2.chr1.bed.gz | gzip -c > NA12878.CTCF_known2.matrix.gz

Finally, we've written an R script to invoke CENTIPEDE called, predictably enough, run_centipede.R.

Here's the command to predict bound TFs in the lab data:

${LAB_DATA}/bin/run_centipede.R NA12878.CTCF_known2.matrix.gz NA12878.CTCF_known2.chr1.bed.gz NA12878.CTCF_known2.centipede.bed.gz 8

The arguments are the matrix, the list of motif locations, the name of the file into which CENTIPEDE should write its predictions, and the field in the motif input file that contains the motifs' scores.

You can create a genome browser track from the CENTIPEDE output, with a little cleanup:

zcat NA12878.CTCF_known2.centipede.bed.gz | awk 'BEGIN{IFS="\t"; OFS="\t"} $NF > 0.99 {print $1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$6,$NF}' | gzip > NA12878.CTCF_known2.bound.bed.gz

We have again created a browser track with predicted CTCF binding sites in the entire hg19 reference, not just chromosome 1. If you add this track to your earlier Genome Browser session, you should see several sites around the GCK locus where CTCF is predicted to be bound. Just paste this into the custom track submission form:

browser position chr7:44,116,289-44,266,468
track name="Predicted bound CTCF motifs in GM12878" description="Predicted bound CTCF motifs in GM12878" visibility=full color=0,128,64 alwaysZero=on maxHeightPixels=50:50:50 windowingFunction=mean smoothingWindow=3
https://theparkerlab.med.umich.edu/gb/tracks/bioinf545/SRR891268.CTCF_known2.bound.bed

To see all of this put together in the entire human reference genome, explore this Genome Browser session:

https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?hgS_doOtherUser=submit&hgS_otherUserName=Scjparker&hgS_otherUserSessionName=bf545%2DATAC%2Dseq%2Dall

It includes tracks for CTCF binding sites found by FIMO, bound CTCF motifs predicted by CENTIPEDE with GM12878 ATAC-seq data, ATAC-seq peaks called on GM12878 ATAC-seq data, and ChIP-seq signal for CTCF in GM12878.