/Contributing-to-OS-Documentation-Checklist

Cover everything you need for an awesome set of docs 🦆

Contributing to Open Source Documentation Checklist

  • Community and Collaboration

    • Does my project have a community section?
    • Is there a code of conduct established for contributors?
    • Are clear guidelines provided for first-time contributors?

  • Documentation Structure

    • Does the documentation have a logical and easily navigable structure?
    • Is a table of contents offered for quick reference?
    • Are there clear and relevant examples in the documentation?

  • Feedback and Improvement

    • Does the documentation have an option for adding feedback or comments?
    • Is there a way to gather metrics to measure the quality of the documentation?
    • Are community reviews and improvements of the documentation encouraged?

  • Accessibility and Search

    • Is the documentation easily searchable?
    • Are alternative formats of the documentation provided (like downloadable PDF, offline version)?
    • Is the documentation optimized for mobile devices and different browsers?

  • Updating and Maintenance

    • Is there an established process to keep the documentation up-to-date?
    • Are community members encouraged to report outdated information or errors?
    • Are periodic reviews of the documentation done to check its relevance and accuracy?

  • Resources and Tools

    • Are relevant tools and resources mentioned and linked in the documentation?
    • Are style guides or templates available for contributors?
    • Is a guide provided on how to set up the local environment for documentation, if necessary?

  • Internationalization and Localization

    • Is the documentation available in multiple languages?
    • Are there guides for contributors wishing to translate or maintain documentation translations?
    • Are tools used to manage and streamline the translation process?

  • Multimedia and Interactivity

    • Are video tutorials or demos incorporated?
    • Are there interactive areas, such as sandboxes or playgrounds, where users can experiment with live examples?
    • Are graphics, diagrams, and other visual representations used to clarify complex points?

  • Integration and Automation

    • Is the documentation integrated directly with development tools (e.g., automatic API documentation generation)?
    • Are automated processes in place to check for broken links or formatting issues in the documentation?
    • Is there a CI/CD process for deploying documentation updates?

  • Security and Privacy Aspects

    • If feedback or metrics are collected, are users clearly informed?
    • Is a clear privacy policy followed on how data is handled and stored?
    • Is the documentation reviewed for possible leaks of sensitive information?

  • Support and Community

    • Is there a forum, chat, or communication channel where users can ask questions or discuss aspects of the documentation?
    • Are significant contributions to the documentation highlighted and recognized?
    • Are there mentorship programs or initiatives to assist new contributors in getting started?

  • Consistency and Quality

    • Is consistent language and tone used throughout the documentation?
    • Is there a peer-review process for contributions to the documentation?
    • Are standard writing and design practices followed to ensure a cohesive user experience?