load test: BTPSO deleted the servicebinding object from k8s cluster, but the servicebinding still exists on BTP side
lin1161 opened this issue · 3 comments
I had a try with BTPSO multi-tenancy features, I created 200 subaccounts (lindsay-subaccount-0 ... lindsay-subaccount-199) , map each to a namespace (lindsay-subaccount-0 ... lindsay-subaccount-199) , created 200 service manager instances (lindsay-subaccount-0-service-manager ... lindsay-subaccount-199-service-manager) in each subaccount,and created an auditlog serviceinstance with binding under each subaccount.
Then deleted all auditlog services and their bindings in parallel, one of the auditlog instance showed DeleteFailed Status,with error :ServiceInstance deletion failed: could not delete instance due to 1 existing bindings
.
I checked there is no servicebinding in the cluster anymore. But there is still one servicebinding for the instance on BTP cockpit.
It looks like btpso removes the servicebinding from the cluster, but on the btp side the servicebinding is not successfully removed.
Sorry I forgot to check btpso's log for error msgs, and the problem may not be reproduced, but I still want to document the problems I've encountered here for future reference.
kubectl get servicebinding -A
No resources found
kubectl get serviceinstance -A
NAMESPACE NAME OFFERING PLAN SHARED DATACENTER STATUS READY AGE
lindsay-subaccount-199 auditlog auditlog-management default DeleteFailed True 18m
kubectl describe serviceinstance auditlog -n lindsay-subaccount-199
Name: auditlog
Namespace: lindsay-subaccount-199
Labels: <none>
Annotations: kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration:
{"apiVersion":"services.cloud.sap.com/v1","kind":"ServiceInstance","metadata":{"annotations":{},"name":"auditlog","namespace":"lindsay-sub...
API Version: services.cloud.sap.com/v1
Kind: ServiceInstance
Metadata:
Creation Timestamp: 2023-10-27T08:41:03Z
Deletion Grace Period Seconds: 0
Deletion Timestamp: 2023-10-27T08:48:35Z
Finalizers:
services.cloud.sap.com/sap-btp-finalizer
Generation: 2
Managed Fields:
API Version: services.cloud.sap.com/v1
Fields Type: FieldsV1
fieldsV1:
f:metadata:
f:annotations:
.:
f:kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration:
f:spec:
.:
f:serviceOfferingName:
f:servicePlanName:
Manager: kubectl
Operation: Update
Time: 2023-10-27T08:41:03Z
API Version: services.cloud.sap.com/v1
Fields Type: FieldsV1
fieldsV1:
f:metadata:
f:finalizers:
.:
v:"services.cloud.sap.com/sap-btp-finalizer":
Manager: Go-http-client
Operation: Update
Time: 2023-10-27T08:46:07Z
API Version: services.cloud.sap.com/v1
Fields Type: FieldsV1
fieldsV1:
f:status:
.:
f:conditions:
f:hashedSpec:
f:instanceID:
f:observedGeneration:
f:ready:
f:subaccountID:
Manager: Go-http-client
Operation: Update
Subresource: status
Time: 2023-10-27T08:50:43Z
Resource Version: 19305
UID: e921f06e-c13b-4f5f-8049-0462381a8b29
Spec:
External Name: auditlog
Service Offering Name: auditlog-management
Service Plan Name: default
User Info:
Groups:
system:masters
system:authenticated
Username: minikube-user
Status:
Conditions:
Last Transition Time: 2023-10-27T08:50:43Z
Message: ServiceInstance deletion failed: could not delete instance due to 1 existing bindings
Observed Generation: 2
Reason: DeleteFailed
Status: False
Type: Succeeded
Last Transition Time: 2023-10-27T08:46:08Z
Message:
Reason: Provisioned
Status: True
Type: Ready
Last Transition Time: 2023-10-27T08:50:43Z
Message: ServiceInstance deletion failed: could not delete instance due to 1 existing bindings
Observed Generation: 2
Reason: DeleteFailed
Status: True
Type: Failed
Hashed Spec: 8f9b6d9b9de7c697690b2b6f561a08f7
Instance ID: a052593e-ce54-4e89-88c5-53e9b31113a1
Observed Generation: 2
Ready: True
Subaccount ID: e35e14f3-8a64-4384-bdcf-596dcb5e1886
Events: <none>
Hi, please provide the binding id and landscape
Sorry, I used a minikube cluster, and had already deleted it.
make sure you are using the latest version of the BTP operator.
also notice that you are using the credentials of subaccount-admin and not operator-access as required, this could lead to inconsistencies.
if the issue reproduces please reopen an attach the relevant binding id