Please consider fixing issues detected by repository checker
ioBroker-Bot opened this issue ยท 6 comments
Notification from ioBroker Check and Service Bot
Dear adapter developer,
I'm the ioBroker Check and Service Bot. I'm an automated tool processing routine tasks for the ioBroker infrastructure. I have recently checked the repository for your adapter energiefluss-erweitert for common errors and appropiate suggestions to keep this adapter up to date.
Please see the result of the check below.
ioBroker.energiefluss-erweitert
๐ No errors found
WARNINGS:
- ๐ [W184] "common.materialize" is deprecated for admin >= 5 at io-package.json. Please use property "adminUI".
- ๐ [W202] Version of package.json (0.5.1-alpha.4) doesn't match latest version on NPM (0.4.1)
- ๐ [W522] Please consider migrating to admin 5 UI (jsonConfig).
Please review issues reported and consider fixing them as soon as appropiate.
Warnings reported by repository checker should be reviewed. While some warnings can be considered as a suggestion and be ignored due to good reasons or a dedicated decision of the developer, most warnings should be fixed as soon as appropiate.
You may start a new check at any time by adding the following comment to this issue:
@iobroker-bot recheck
Please note that I (and the server at GitHub) have always plenty of work to do. So it may last up to 30 minutes until you see a reaction. I will drop a comment here as soon as I start processing.
Feel free to contact me (@ioBroker-Bot) if you have any questions or feel that an issue is incorrectly flagged.
And THANKS A LOT for maintaining this adapter from me and all users.
Let's work together for the best user experience.
your
ioBroker Check and Service Bot
Note: This issue replaces issue #238
@mcm1957 for evidence
see #238 (comment)
Yes, right. He closes the other one and opens up a new one.
I thought, he will close that one, because only warnings - no errors.
The bot will open a new issue if any warning or error is open. Many warnings are not critical but should be solved anyway.
I'm considering some sort of suggestion/warning in future. But as the web checker (iobroker.dev) only knows about error and warning and as far as I know nobody has time to adapt something there its a litle bit tricky to find a solution for the robot. But I'm aware of it. Until then please leave the issue open and ignore the warning
Understand.
Can I help somehow?
This issue has been replaced by new isse #242
This issue can be closed.
your
ioBroker Check and Service Bot