/ASC_CO2

Simulation of amplitude of seasonal cycle of CO2 using P model

Primary LanguageR

ASC_CO2

Simulation of amplitude of seasonal cycle (ASC) of CO2 using P model.

Scheme and procedure

The simulation of CO2 ASC spans from 1901 to 2016 on a global scale (0.5*0.5 degree), assuming vegetation carbon pool and soil carbon pool is in equilibrium in 1901, and calculate changes in these pools and consequently the ecosystem respiration due to environmental changes, and finally the amplitude of CO2 ASC using atmospheric transport modelling (TM3).

In this simulation, gross primary production (GPP) is first quanified using Pyrealm package based on P model. Using biomass production efficiency (BFE), GPP is partitioned into autotrophic respiration (Ra) and net primary production (NPP), which contributes to vegetation biomass carbon. Using vegetation turnover rate, vegetation biomass carbon is converted to soil carbon , and then heterotrophic respiration can be calculated from labile soil carbon, a fraction of soil carbon that is accessible to decomposition.

A flowchart of the simulation and related equations are provided in README.pdf. The detailed procedure and data inputs used in the simulation is in later section.

Biomass production efficiency (BFE)

Net primary production (NPP) are calculated using biomass production efficiency, the ratio of NPP/GPP: NPP = GPP × BFE; then autotrophic respiration (Ra) can be calcualted as Ra = GPP - NPP.

BFE is a constant value for each plant functional types (PFT) except for forest. For forest, BFE = 0.19+0.006×MAT-0.00038×age+6.8E-5×TAP +0.0039×|lat|. MAT stands for mean annual temperature, while TAP stands for total annual precipitation. The BFE value for other PFT are derived from He et al. (2020) and Campioli et al. (2015), and is shown in the table

Plant functional type (PFT) Biomass production efficiency (BFE)
Grassland 0.45
Cropland 0.55
Tundra 0.45
Savanna 0.47
Shrubland 0.47

Soil heterotrophic respiration rate

Soil heterotrophic respiration rate is calculated as k_s = f(T) * f(M), while f(T) and f(M) is soil heterotrophic respiration affected by temperature and soil moisture respectively.

The temperature function of soil heterotrophic respiration uses the Q10, but instead of a simple Q10 with single air temperature, we used a depth-resolved f(T) averaging f(T) at every 10cm over the full 0-1 m depth interval following Kovern et al. 2017, to account for the vertical variation in soil climate. Temperature at each depth is calculated following Campbell and Norman (1998). The moisture function of soil respiration rate followed Yan et al. (2018). For detailed equations please refer to the pdf file.

Monthly soil respiration is calculated as above and aggregated to obtain annual soil respiration.

Forcing data

GPP is forced by meterological data from CRU4.04, which covers monthly mean air temperature, minimum and maximum temperature and vapour pressure. Solar radiation are derived from WFD (1901-1978) combined with WFDE5 (1979-2016) with WFD corrected to match with WFDE5. fAPAR data were downloaded from GIMMS 3g fAPAR; as remote sensing data of vegetation cover is not avilable before 1982, fAPAR in 1982 was used for period 1901-1981.

Meterological data derived from CRU4.01 was used in SPLASH v2.0, including precipitation, temperature and cloud cover, which then coverted to solar radiation.

Forest age map used to quantify forest biomass production efficiency is downloaded at GFAD v1.1, and land cover used to calculate NPP and Ra are derived from ISAM-HYDE (1901-2010) and MODIS land cover product MCD12C1 v006 (2011-2016). For consistency, initial global carbon pool data of vegetation and soil were also derived from ISAM model in TRENDY v8.

Soil property data, including fraction of soil texture type, porosity, and fraction of organic matter were derived from ISRIC-WISE global dataset (v3.0) to quantify soil respiration rate.

Reference

  1. He, Y, Peng, S, Liu, Y, et al. Global vegetation biomass production efficiency constrained by models and observations. Glob Change Biol.; 26: 1474– 1484 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14816
  2. Campioli, M., Vicca, S., Luyssaert, S. et al. Biomass production efficiency controlled by management in temperate and boreal ecosystems. Nature Geosci 8, 843–846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2553
  3. Koven, C., Hugelius, G., Lawrence, D. et al. Higher climatological temperature sensitivity of soil carbon in cold than warm climates. Nature Clim Change 7, 817–822 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3421
  4. Campbell, G. S., & Norman, J. An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer Science & Business Media. (2012).
  5. Yan, Z., Bond-Lamberty, B., Todd-Brown, K.E. et al. A moisture function of soil heterotrophic respiration that incorporates microscale processes. Nat Commun 9, 2562 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04971-6