Static Linking FastRoute

Question

Static Linking FastRoute

tajayi opened this issue 5 years ago · 5 comments

Hi All,
Thanks for all the work put into the tool with the rest of our flow. I am attempting to test fastRoute now but running into issues with dynamically linked libraries. I am able to build the binary but seeing linker issues when I try to run on a different machine.

Can you please look into statically linking as many libraries? Specifically the following

libpng12
libz
librt
libboost_system
libboost_filesystem
libboost_program_options
libQt5PrintSupport
libQt5OpenGL
libQt5Widgets
libQt5Gui
libQt5Core

Thanks

cc: @abk-openroad @mgwoo @mik226

Answer 1 · 2019-07-24T17:54:19.000Z

Hi, @tajayi.
We updated the dev branch with the static linking of the libraries. Can you test it?

Thanks.

Answer 2 · 2019-07-24T17:58:45.000Z

Thanks for the quick turn around. testing now

Answer 3 · 2019-07-25T01:08:00.000Z

Static linking is good. Able to run on multiple machines. I just verified it with out very simple design. I'm about to try it out on more designs.

Answer 4 · 2019-07-25T02:14:40.000Z

Great! Thanks very much, Tutu and Eder / Vitor / Isadora. @Eder/Vitor/Isadora, Minsoo mentioned a correctness issue found with his additional testcases (unconnected nets or uncovered pins -- don't recall which). Has this been fixed now? Also, I hope the creation of tests has gone well (email w/Vitor this morning). Thanks again,

…

-- Andrew p.s. Same as last night - please tell me if I should transfer, make public, etc. .... :-)

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:08 PM Tutu Ajayi ***@***.***> wrote: Closed #1 <#1>. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJTUPKVWQSXSN2HUEQHJPWDQBD4HDANCNFSM4IGJHC4Q> .

Answer 5 · 2019-07-25T06:14:42.000Z

p.s. Based on Minsoo's go-ahead, I transferred ownership to The-OpenROAD-Project and made the repository public. I hope that the last few fixes / improvements are going well. (Minsoo mentioned that he was discussing some issues seen in both Nangate45 (overflow) and TSMC65LP (unconnected pins) with Eder et al.) Let's try to catch up to the complete list of issues (which mostly should be closed) in tomorrow's 4pm PT call. BTW, does FastRoute4-lefdef run clean with ASAP7 ? It seems that this is one of the standard PDKs used by the RDF flow. Thanks very much,

…

-- Andrew On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:14 PM abk openroad <abk-openroad@eng.ucsd.edu> wrote:

Great! Thanks very much, Tutu and Eder / Vitor / Isadora. @Eder/Vitor/Isadora, Minsoo mentioned a correctness issue found with his additional testcases (unconnected nets or uncovered pins -- don't recall which). Has this been fixed now? Also, I hope the creation of tests has gone well (email w/Vitor this morning). Thanks again, -- Andrew p.s. Same as last night - please tell me if I should transfer, make public, etc. .... :-) On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:08 PM Tutu Ajayi ***@***.***> wrote: > Closed #1 <#1>. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#1>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJTUPKVWQSXSN2HUEQHJPWDQBD4HDANCNFSM4IGJHC4Q> > . >