Contributor
aaronjcopley opened this issue · 3 comments
I appreciate the call out as a contributor for the Proofpoint script, but I can't take credit for it. I wanted to be sure that you saw my reply on Gist (https://gist.github.com/aaronjcopley/65a5198bf7b35361fdd315e786be9b9d#gistcomment-2936712) because I also noted there is a newer version published there.
Thanks!
Hi Aaron,
I actually ended up using your modified block for a long time since it seemed to be smaller and suited perfectly, its been tweaked slightly now but still functions almost identically. Hence why I contributed you instead of ProofPoint.
I saw the reply, and meant to respond but didn't get a chance, if you want I can take you off the contributors list, although i'm happy to have you on there.
-C
Glad my edits were helpful as small as they were. I just felt I was getting too much credit where it wasn't exactly due. I came across this repo in a search and didn't want the originial authors to be slighted. :)
i've modified the readme so everyone is contributed correctly now. The original block of code from PP is linked too, and you still get cred for the modified block - I think that's fair!