This repository contains LLaMA-30B inference code for applying the following system-view techniques in the original lm-evaluation harness:
We apply 1) model parallelism, 2) tensor parallelism, and 3) inference-optimized kernel technique with tensor parallelism.
The original lm-evaluation harness supports 1) model parallelism, and deepspeed supports 2) tensor parallelism, and 3) inference-optimized kernel technique.
Let us assume that the weights of LLaMA-30B are loaded locally in advance. Also, it is assumed that all settings such as deepspeed have been completed. For deepspeed settings, see here.
To test LLaMA-30B with model parallelism, execute the following command.
python main.py --model hf-causal-experimental --model_args pretrained=[path of weights in local],use_accelerate=True --batch_size [your batch size] --tasks [task name e.g., hellaswag] --no_cache --device cuda --parallel mp
To test LLama-30B with tensor parallelism, execute the following command.
deepspeed --num_gpus 4 main.py --model hf-causal-experimental --model_args pretrained=[path of weights in local],use_accelerate=False --batch_size [your batch size] --tasks [task name e.g., hellaswag] --no_cache --device cuda --parallel tp
To test the inference-optimized technique with tensor parallelism, execute the following command with the flag "--iok".
deepspeed --num_gpus 4 main.py --model hf-causal-experimental --model_args pretrained=[path of weights in local],use_accelerate=False --batch_size [your batch size] --tasks [task name e.g., hellaswag] --no_cache --device cuda --parallel tp --iok
(as of 6/15/23)
We have a revamp of the Evaluation Harness library internals staged on the big-refactor branch! It is far along in progress, but before we start to move the master branch of the repository over to this new design with a new version release, we'd like to ensure that it's been tested by outside users and there are no glaring bugs.
We’d like your help to test it out! you can help by:
- Trying out your current workloads on the big-refactor branch, and seeing if anything breaks or is counterintuitive,
- Porting tasks supported in the previous version of the harness to the new YAML configuration format. Please check out our task implementation guide for more information.
If you choose to port a task not yet completed according to our checklist, then you can contribute it by opening a PR containing [Refactor] in the name with:
- A shell command to run the task in the
masterbranch, and what the score is - A shell command to run the task in your PR branch to
big-refactor, and what the resulting score is, to show that we achieve equality between the two implementations.
Lastly, we'll no longer be accepting new feature requests beyond those that are already open to the master branch as we carry out this switch to the new version over the next week, though we will be accepting bugfixes to master branch and PRs to big-refactor. Feel free to reach out in the #lm-thunderdome channel of the EAI discord for more information.
This project provides a unified framework to test generative language models on a large number of different evaluation tasks.
Features:
- 200+ tasks implemented. See the task-table for a complete list.
- Support for models loaded via transformers (including quantization via AutoGPTQ), GPT-NeoX, and Megatron-DeepSpeed, with a flexible tokenization-agnostic interface.
- Support for commercial APIs including OpenAI, goose.ai, and TextSynth.
- Support for evaluation on adapters (e.g. LoRa) supported in HuggingFace's PEFT library.
- Evaluating with publicly available prompts ensures reproducibility and comparability between papers.
- Task versioning to ensure reproducibility when tasks are updated.
To install lm-eval from the github repository main branch, run:
git clone https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness
cd lm-evaluation-harness
pip install -e .To install additional multilingual tokenization and text segmentation packages, you must install the package with the multilingual extra:
pip install -e ".[multilingual]"To support loading GPTQ quantized models, install the package with the auto-gptq extra:
pip install -e ".[auto-gptq]"Note: When reporting results from eval harness, please include the task versions (shown in
results["versions"]) for reproducibility. This allows bug fixes to tasks while also ensuring that previously reported scores are reproducible. See the Task Versioning section for more info.
To evaluate a model hosted on the HuggingFace Hub (e.g. GPT-J-6B) on hellaswag you can use the following command:
python main.py \
--model hf-causal \
--model_args pretrained=EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B \
--tasks hellaswag \
--device cuda:0Additional arguments can be provided to the model constructor using the --model_args flag. Most notably, this supports the common practice of using the revisions feature on the Hub to store partially trained checkpoints, or to specify the datatype for running a model:
python main.py \
--model hf-causal \
--model_args pretrained=EleutherAI/pythia-160m,revision=step100000,dtype="float" \
--tasks lambada_openai,hellaswag \
--device cuda:0To evaluate models that are loaded via AutoSeq2SeqLM in Huggingface, you instead use hf-seq2seq. To evaluate (causal) models across multiple GPUs, use --model hf-causal-experimental
Warning: Choosing the wrong model may result in erroneous outputs despite not erroring.
Our library also supports language models served via the OpenAI API:
export OPENAI_API_SECRET_KEY=YOUR_KEY_HERE
python main.py \
--model gpt3 \
--model_args engine=davinci \
--tasks lambada_openai,hellaswagWhile this functionality is only officially maintained for the official OpenAI API, it tends to also work for other hosting services that use the same API such as goose.ai with minor modification. We also have an implementation for the TextSynth API, using --model textsynth.
To verify the data integrity of the tasks you're performing in addition to running the tasks themselves, you can use the --check_integrity flag:
python main.py \
--model gpt3 \
--model_args engine=davinci \
--tasks lambada_openai,hellaswag \
--check_integrityA number of other libraries contain scripts for calling the eval harness through their library. These include GPT-NeoX, Megatron-DeepSpeed, and mesh-transformer-jax.
💡 Tip: You can inspect what the LM inputs look like by running the following command:
python write_out.py \
--tasks all_tasks \
--num_fewshot 5 \
--num_examples 10 \
--output_base_path /path/to/output/folderThis will write out one text file for each task.
For models loaded with the HuggingFace transformers library, any arguments provided via --model_args get passed to the relevant constructor directly. This means that anything you can do with AutoModel can be done with our library. For example, you can pass a local path via pretrained= or use models finetuned with PEFT by taking the call you would run to evaluate the base model and add ,peft=PATH to the model_args argument:
python main.py \
--model hf-causal-experimental \
--model_args pretrained=EleutherAI/gpt-j-6b,peft=nomic-ai/gpt4all-j-lora \
--tasks openbookqa,arc_easy,winogrande,hellaswag,arc_challenge,piqa,boolq \
--device cuda:0GPTQ quantized models can be loaded by specifying their file names in ,quantized=NAME (or ,quantized=True for default names) in the model_args argument:
python main.py \
--model hf-causal-experimental \
--model_args pretrained=model-name-or-path,quantized=model.safetensors,gptq_use_triton=True \
--tasks hellaswagWe support wildcards in task names, for example you can run all of the machine-translated lambada tasks via --task lambada_openai_mt_*.
We currently only support one prompt per task, which we strive to make the "standard" as defined by the benchmark's authors. If you would like to study how varying prompts causes changes in the evaluation score, check out the BigScience fork of this repo. We are currently working on upstreaming this capability to main.
To implement a new task in the eval harness, see this guide.
To help improve reproducibility, all tasks have a VERSION field. When run from the command line, this is reported in a column in the table, or in the "version" field in the evaluator return dict. The purpose of the version is so that if the task definition changes (i.e to fix a bug), then we can know exactly which metrics were computed using the old buggy implementation to avoid unfair comparisons. To enforce this, there are unit tests that make sure the behavior of all tests remains the same as when they were first implemented. Task versions start at 0, and each time a breaking change is made, the version is incremented by one.
When reporting eval harness results, please also report the version of each task. This can be done either with a separate column in the table, or by reporting the task name with the version appended as such: taskname-v0.
To address concerns about train / test contamination, we provide utilities for comparing results on a benchmark using only the data points not found in the model training set. Unfortunately, outside of models trained on the Pile and C4, its very rare that people who train models disclose the contents of the training data. However this utility can be useful to evaluate models you have trained on private data, provided you are willing to pre-compute the necessary indices. We provide computed indices for 13-gram exact match deduplication against the Pile, and plan to add additional precomputed dataset indices in the future (including C4 and min-hash LSH deduplication).
For details on text decontamination, see the decontamination guide.
Note that the directory provided to the --decontamination_ngrams_path argument should contain the ngram files and info.json. See the above guide for ngram generation for the pile, this could be adapted for other training sets.
python main.py \
--model gpt2 \
--tasks sciq \
--decontamination_ngrams_path path/containing/training/set/ngrams \
--device cuda:0@software{eval-harness,
author = {Gao, Leo and
Tow, Jonathan and
Biderman, Stella and
Black, Sid and
DiPofi, Anthony and
Foster, Charles and
Golding, Laurence and
Hsu, Jeffrey and
McDonell, Kyle and
Muennighoff, Niklas and
Phang, Jason and
Reynolds, Laria and
Tang, Eric and
Thite, Anish and
Wang, Ben and
Wang, Kevin and
Zou, Andy},
title = {A framework for few-shot language model evaluation},
month = sep,
year = 2021,
publisher = {Zenodo},
version = {v0.0.1},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.5371628},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5371628}
}