Fix the legend in the review export

[drpaulralph]

Now that we're numbering problems 1 to 4, we need to use the same numbers in the text export, as below. Notes: 1) reasons for rejection should be listed in descending order of type number, 2) we update the legend accordingly; 3) the legend should use the same text as in the type 1-4 tool tips minus the parenthetical examples.

BEFORE:

=================
Review Checklist

Recommended Decision: REJECT

Reasons for Rejection
F states a purpose, problem, objective, or research question
U explains why the problem, objective, or research question is important
U defines jargon, acronyms and key concepts
U methodology is appropriate for stated purpose or questions

Essential
Y describes in detail what, where, when and how data were collected
...
Y presents a clear chain of evidence from observations to findings

=======
Legend

Y = Yes, the paper has this attribute
R = Reasonable deviation
F = (easily) Fixable deviation
U = Unfixable (or not easily fixable) deviation
N = No, the paper does not have this attribute

AFTER:

=================
Review Checklist

Recommended Decision: REJECT

Reasons for Rejection
4 states a purpose, problem, objective, or research question
3 explains why the problem, objective, or research question is important
2 defines jargon, acronyms and key concepts
1 methodology is appropriate for stated purpose or questions

Essential
Y describes in detail what, where, when and how data were collected
...
Y presents a clear chain of evidence from observations to findings

=======
Legend

Y = yes, the paper has this attribute
R = a reasonable, acceptable deviation from the standards
1 = can be fixed by editing text only
2 = can be fixed by doing some new data analysis, redoing some existing data analysis, or collecting a small amount of additional data
3 = can be fixed completely redoing data analysis, or collecting additional data
4 = unacceptable conduct or problems the cannot be fixed without doing a brand new study