Folsom is an attempt at a small and stable memcache client. Folsom is fully asynchronous, based on Netty and uses Java 8's CompletionStage through-out the API.
- Java 8 or higher
- Maven
- Netty 4
- Yammer metrics
- Google Guava
Folsom is meant to be used as a library embedded in other software.
To import it with maven, use this:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.spotify</groupId>
<artifactId>folsom</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- optional if you want to expose folsom metrics with spotify-semantic-metrics -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.spotify</groupId>
<artifactId>folsom-semantic-metrics</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- optional if you want to expose folsom metrics with yammer -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.spotify</groupId>
<artifactId>folsom-yammer-metrics</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
</dependency>
We are using semantic versioning
The main entry point to the folsom API is the MemcacheClientBuilder class. It has chainable setter methods to configure various aspects of the client. The methods connectBinary() and connectAscii() constructs MemcacheClient instances utilising the binary protocol and ascii protocol respectively. For details on their differences see Protocol below.
All calls to the folsom API that interacts with a memcache server is asynchronous and the result is typically accessible from CompletionStage instances. An exception to this rule are the methods that connects clients to their remote endpoints, MemcacheClientBuilder.connectBinary() and MemcacheClientBuilder.connectAscii() which will return a MemcacheClient immediately while asynchronously attempting to connect to the configured remote endpoint(s).
As code using the folsom API should be written so that it handles failing intermittently with MemcacheClosedException anyway, waiting for the initial connect to complete is not something folsom concerns itself with. For single server connections, ConnectFuture provides functionality to wait for the initial connection to succeed, as can be seen in the example below.
final MemcacheClient<String> client = MemcacheClientBuilder.newStringClient()
.withAddress(hostname)
.connectAscii();
// make we wait until the client has connected to the server
ConnectFuture.connectFuture(client).toCompletableFuture().get();
client.set("key", "value", 10000).toCompletableFuture().get();
client.get("key").toCompletableFuture().get();
client.shutdown();
Clients are single use, after shutdown
has been invoked the client can no
longer be used.
If you are still on Java 7, you can depend on the older version:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.spotify</groupId>
<artifactId>folsom</artifactId>
<version>0.8.1</version>
</dependency>
- Robustness - If you request something, the future you get back should always complete at some point.
- Error detection - If something goes wrong (the memcache server is behaving incorrectly or some internal bug occurs), we try to detect it and drop the connection to prevent further problems.
- Simplicity - The code base is intended to be small and well abstracted. We prefer simple solutions that solve the major usecases and avoid implementing optimizations that would give small returns.
- Fail-fast - If something happens (the memcached service is slow or gets disconnected) we try to fail as fast as possible. How to handle the error is up to you, and you probably want to know about the error as soon as possible.
- Modularity - The complex client code is isolated in a single class, and all the extra functionality are in composable modules: (ketama, reconnecting, retry, roundrobin)
- Efficiency - We want to support a high traffic throughput without using too much CPU or memory resources.
- Asynchronous - We fully support the idea of writing asynchronous code instead of blocking threads, and this is achieved through Java 8 futures.
- Low amount of synchronization - Code that uses a lot of synchronization primitives is more likely to have race condition bugs and deadlocks. We try to isolate that as much as possible to minimize the risk, and most of the code base doesn't have to care.
Folsom implements both the binary protocol and ascii protocol. They share a common interface but also extend it with their own specializations.
Which protocol to use depends on your use case. With a regular memcached backend, the ascii protocol is much more efficient. The binary protocol is a bit chattier but also makes error detection easier.
interface MemcacheClient<T> {}
interface AsciiMemcacheClient<T> extends MemcacheClient<T> {}
interface BinaryMemcacheClient<T> extends MemcacheClient<T> {}
See changelog.
Folsom support Ketama for sharing across a set of memcache servers. Note that the caching algorithm (currently) doesn't attempt to provide compatibility with other memcache clients, and thus when switching client implementation you will get a period of low cache hit ratio.
You can optionally choose to track performance using yammer metrics. You will need to include
folsom-yammer-metrics
dependency in this case.
mvn package
This project adheres to the Open Code of Conduct. By participating, you are expected to honor this code.
Folsom was initially built at [Spotify](<https://github.com/spotify) by Kristofer Karlsson, Niklas Gustavsson and Daniel Norberg. Many thanks also go out to Noa Resare.