The following gives and overview of a report structure. You can adjust to fit your needs.
- Abstract (0.5 page)
- Introduction (1 page)
- The Problem (1 page )
- Related work (2 pages)
- Your Idea or solution (1 page)
- The Details ( 5 to 8 pages)
- Conclusion and further work (1 page)
| LEVEL |
DESCRIPTION |
| (1) Poor |
not relevant to the topic |
| (2) Marginal |
not insightful |
| (3) Acceptable |
general with details |
| (4) Good |
summary with some details |
| (5) Honors |
Summary presented as an abstract with details such as concepts, relevance, applications, etc. |
|
Poor |
Marginal |
Acceptable |
Good |
Honors |
| Originality of the work |
|
|
|
|
|
| Scholarly relevance |
|
|
|
|
|
| Professional/industrial relevance |
|
|
|
|
|
| Completeness of the work |
|
|
|
|
|
| Acknowledgment of the work of others by references |
|
|
|
|
|
| Organization of the manuscript |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clarity in writing, tables, graphs and illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| To what extent does the student’s presentation communicate both the merits of the research project and the research process that the student went through to complete the project? |
|
|
|
|
|
| To what extent can the student communicate effectively about the project? Can the student provide cogent responses to questions? Can the student defend the research proposal suggestions made? |
|
|
|
|
|
| To what extent the student has displayed an extensive literature review when conducting the project? |
|
|
|
|
|
Total: ??/15