This project implements a subset of CSS including flexbox and the box model using pure JavaScript, then transpiled to C and Java. The goal is to have a small standalone library to layout elements. It doesn't rely on the DOM at all.
In order to make sure that the code is correct, it is developed in JavaScript using TDD where each commit adds a unit test and the associated code to make it work. All the unit tests are tested against Chrome's implementation of CSS.
The JavaScript version has been implemented in a way that can be easily transpiled to C and Java via regexes. The layout function doesn't do any allocation nor uses any of the dynamic aspect of JavaScript. The tests are also transpiled to make sure that the implementations are correct everywhere.
A single function computeLayout
is exposed and
- takes a tree of nodes:
{ style: { ... }, children: [ nodes ] }
- returns a tree of rectangles:
{ width: ..., height: ..., top: ..., left: ..., children: [ rects ] }
For example,
computeLayout(
{style: {padding: 50}, children: [
{style: {padding: 10, alignSelf: 'stretch'}}
]}
);
// =>
{width: 120, height: 120, top: 0, left: 0, children: [
{width: 20, height: 20, top: 50, left: 50}
]}
To run the tests
- For the JS tests: Open
RunLayoutTests.html
andRunLayoutRandomTests.html
in Chrome or run$ npm test
- For the C and Java tests: run
make
in your terminal. It will also transpile the JS code
Name | Value |
---|---|
width, height | positive number |
minWidth, minHeight | positive number |
maxWidth, maxHeight | positive number |
left, right, top, bottom | number |
margin, marginLeft, marginRight, marginTop, marginBottom | number |
padding, paddingLeft, paddingRight, paddingTop, paddingBottom | positive number |
borderWidth, borderLeftWidth, borderRightWidth, borderTopWidth, borderBottomWidth | positive number |
flexDirection | 'column', 'row' |
justifyContent | 'flex-start', 'center', 'flex-end', 'space-between', 'space-around' |
alignItems, alignSelf | 'flex-start', 'center', 'flex-end', 'stretch' |
flex | positive number |
flexWrap | 'wrap', 'nowrap' |
position | 'relative', 'absolute' |
inherit
value is not implemented because it's a way to disambiguate between multiple colliding rules. This should be done in a pre-processing step, not in the actual layout algorithm.
Since we are only using flexbox, we can use defaults that are much more sensible. This is the configuration to use in order to get the same behavior using the DOM and CSS. You can try those default settings with the following JSFiddle.
div, span {
box-sizing: border-box;
position: relative;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: stretch;
flex-shrink: 0;
border: 0 solid black;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
box-sizing: border-box
is the most convenient way to express the relation betweenwidth
andborderWidth
.- Everything is
display: flex
by default. All the behaviors ofblock
andinline-block
can be expressed in term offlex
but not the opposite. - All the flex elements are oriented from top to bottom, left to right and do not shrink. This is how things are laid out using the default CSS settings and what you'd expect.
- Everything is
position: relative
. This makesposition: absolute
target the direct parent and not some parent which is eitherrelative
orabsolute
. If you want to position an element relative to something else, you should move it in the DOM instead of relying of CSS. It also makestop, left, right, bottom
do something when not specifyingposition: absolute
.