Wild is a linker with the goal of being very fast for iterative development.
It's still very much a work-in-progress and definitely shouldn't be used for linking any production binaries. It's probably not really ready for development purposes yet, since there's a bunch of important stuff it can't yet do like debug info and dynamic linking.
Mold is already very fast, however it doesn't do incremental linking and the author has stated that they don't intend to. Wild doesn't do incremental linking yet, but that is the end-goal. By writing Wild in Rust, it's hoped that the complexity of incremental linking will be achievable.
Lots of stuff. Here are some of the larger things that aren't yet done, roughly sorted by current priority:
- Debug info
- Support for position-independent static executables
- Dynamic linking
- Incremental linking
- Mac support
- Windows support
- Support for architectures other than x86-64
- Support for a wider range of linker flags
- Linker scripts
- LTO
Install readelf, then run:
readelf -p .comment my-executableLook for a line like:
Linker: Wild version 0.1.0
Or if you don't want to install readelf, you can probably get away with:
strings my-executable | grep LinkerIt's somewhat of a tradition for linkers to end with the letters "ld". e.g. "GNU ld, "gold", "lld", "mold". Since the end-goal is for the linker to be incremental, an "I" is added. The "W" doesn't stand for anything and was just selected based on it giving an interesting word.
There are lots of features that Wild doesn't yet support, so I'm not sure benchmarking is super useful at this stage. That said, I have done some very preliminary comparisons. I've tried linking the binary in my warm build benchmark repository, which builds an ~80MB, non-PIE, statically linked binary with symbol tables, eh-frames and no debug info. On my laptop, I get the following times:
| Linker | Time (ms) | ± Standard deviation (ms) | CPU time (ms) | File size (MiB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNU ld | 12300 | 150 | 12299 | 80.3 |
| gold | 3365 | 30 | 3362 | 83.3 |
| lld | 905 | 5.6 | 1222 | 84.8 |
| mold | 457 | 7.2 | 2834 | 81.1 |
| wild | 363 | 6.6 | 1585 | 80.9 |
Notes about these results:
- CPU time is user + system CPU time as reported by hyperfine.
- Mold by default forks, which lets the user not wait for the mold process that does the work to shutdown. This is a neat optimisation. In the above benchmarks, the time column is with this optimisation enabled. The CPU time however is with this optimisation disabled (--no-fork), since when forking is enabled, we can't easily measure the CPU time.
I want to stress that this is only one benchmark. Many unknowns remain:
- Will the results be significantly different for other benchmarks?
- How will Wild scale up when linking much larger binaries and/or on systems with many CPU cores?
- Will implementing the missing features require changes to Wild's design that might slow it down?
All we can really conclude from this benchmark is that Wild is currently reasonably efficient at non-incremental linking and reasonable at taking advantage of a few threads. I don't think that adding the missing features should change this benchmark significantly. i.e. adding support for debug info really shouldn't change our speed when linking with no debug info. I can't be sure however until I implement these missing features.
If you decide to benchmark Wild against other linkers, in order to make it a fair comparison, you should ensure that the other linkers aren't doing work on something that Wild doesn't support. In particular:
- No debug info should be linked. e.g. pass --strip-debug to all linkers
- A non-PIE binary should be produced. i.e. pass --no-pie
There might be other flags that speed up the other linkers by letting them avoid some work that they're currently doing. If you know of such flags, please let me know.
Currently Wild only works with somewhat specific compilation and linking options. The following is a
cargo test command-line that can be used to build and test a crate using Wild. This has been run
successfully on a few popular crates (e.g. ripgrep, serde, tokio, rand, bitflags). It assumes that
the "wild" binary is on your path.
cargo test --target x86_64-unknown-linux-musl --config 'target.x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.linker="/usr/bin/clang-15"' --config 'target.x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.rustflags=["-C", "relocation-model=static", "-C", "target-feature=+crt-static", "-C", "debuginfo=0", "-C", "link-arg=--ld-path=wild"]'If you'd like to work on something specific, please reach out either by filing an issue or via email so that we can avoid any wasted work. I like talking to people about Rust by video chat. If you'd like to discuss Wild, Rust compile times etc, you can book a slot in my calendar. If you can't find anything at a time that suits, email me and I'll see if we can find a time that works.
If you'd like to sponsor this work, that would be very much appreciated. The more sponsorship I get the longer I can continue to work on this project full time.
Licensed under either of Apache License, Version 2.0 or MIT license at your option.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in Wild by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.