Issues
- 0
[discussion] Decide whether or not to express FPU nuances for `@platforms//cpu:armv*-m*` constraints
#100 opened by armandomontanez - 0
Support for UEFI targets
#98 opened by amari - 0
`//cpu:ppc64`
#96 opened by mattyclarkson - 1
- 0
[question] bazel platforms for c/c++ how to distinguish the toolchain while they are same cpu and os
#88 opened by damonChenzf07 - 1
i386 vs x86_32
#83 opened by matzf - 13
MacOS being detected as multiple OSes
#61 opened by andrewkatson - 2
Constraints for CPU features?
#13 opened by yesudeep - 4
Repository `@rules_license` is not defined
#66 opened by oliverlee - 0
platform_data syntax error
#81 opened by katre - 3
- 2
Implement Standard Platform Transitions
#73 opened by katre - 0
Prefer cpu:aarch64 to cpu:arm64
#68 opened by MaskRay - 20
Platform Commonalities: e.g. Apple, POSIX, etc.
#37 opened by cpsauer - 3
Define a value for "no OS"?
#40 opened by UlrichEckhardt - 2
How to reference the platform repository.
#59 opened by esharkwang - 1
- 4
- 22
Constraints for ABI
#38 opened by UebelAndre - 10
Define a distribution constraint setting
#5 opened by mboes - 1
- 1
Should we make a branch per Bazel LTS branch?
#27 opened by aiuto - 1
- 9
Processors and Environments
#9 opened by wpieterse2825 - 1
Add cpp examples
#35 opened by AngusK - 2
How to use the wasm32 CPU target
#18 opened by yagehu - 1
Please create a release
#15 opened by olekw - 3
Please list names of CODEOWNERS
#14 opened by olekw