`cc_shared_library` `shared_lib_name` crashing for non-standard file endings
classner opened this issue · 0 comments
classner commented
Description of the problem / feature request:
Adding shared_lib_name to a cc_shared_library with a non-standard file ending crashes bazel.
Bugs: what's the simplest, easiest way to reproduce this bug? Please provide a minimal example if possible.
cc_shared_library(
name = "asdf",
shared_lib_name = "asdf.asdf",
deps = ...
)
Example reproducer: https://github.com/classner/bazel_shared_lib_name_reproducer
Error:
FATAL: bazel crashed due to an internal error. Printing stack trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unrecoverable error while evaluating node 'ConfiguredTargetKey{label=//:bazel_data_reproducer, config=BuildConfigurationKey[096dcc84165363e69a851ebe8131b032f5448c94ddc4951775429dc78e79f898]}' (requested by nodes 'ConfiguredTargetKey{label=//:bazel_data_reproducer, config=BuildConfigurationKey[8e4ab22e89843aa348ba782be25eadb5bae40f2ae62dec3edd2cdaf809e8d7b1]}')
at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:550)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.AbstractQueueVisitor$WrappedRunnable.run(AbstractQueueVisitor.java:414)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(Unknown Source)
Caused by: net.starlark.java.eval.Starlark$UncheckedEvalException: IllegalArgumentException thrown during Starlark evaluation (//:bazel_data_reproducer)
at <starlark>.link(<builtin>:0)
at <starlark>._link(/virtual_builtins_bzl/common/cc/cc_common.bzl:144)
at <starlark>._cc_shared_library_impl(/virtual_builtins_bzl/common/cc/cc_shared_library.bzl:718)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
at com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument(Preconditions.java:129)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.SolibSymlinkAction.getDynamicLibrarySymlinkInternal(SolibSymlinkAction.java:216)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.SolibSymlinkAction.getDynamicLibrarySymlink(SolibSymlinkAction.java:150)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CcLinkingHelper.getDynamicLibrarySolibSymlinkOutput(CcLinkingHelper.java:1020)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CcLinkingHelper.createDynamicLinkAction(CcLinkingHelper.java:803)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CcLinkingHelper.createCcLinkActions(CcLinkingHelper.java:467)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CcLinkingHelper.link(CcLinkingHelper.java:375)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CcModule.link(CcModule.java:2530)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at net.starlark.java.eval.MethodDescriptor.call(MethodDescriptor.java:178)
at net.starlark.java.eval.BuiltinFunction.fastcall(BuiltinFunction.java:78)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Starlark.fastcall(Starlark.java:806)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.evalCall(Eval.java:682)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.eval(Eval.java:497)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.execReturn(Eval.java:249)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.exec(Eval.java:288)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.execStatements(Eval.java:82)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.execFunctionBody(Eval.java:66)
at net.starlark.java.eval.StarlarkFunction.fastcall(StarlarkFunction.java:179)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Starlark.fastcall(Starlark.java:806)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.evalCall(Eval.java:682)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.eval(Eval.java:497)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.execAssignment(Eval.java:109)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.exec(Eval.java:268)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.execStatements(Eval.java:82)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Eval.execFunctionBody(Eval.java:66)
at net.starlark.java.eval.StarlarkFunction.fastcall(StarlarkFunction.java:179)
at net.starlark.java.eval.Starlark.fastcall(Starlark.java:806)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.starlark.StarlarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.evalRule(StarlarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.java:100)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createRule(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:376)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:194)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.SkyframeBuildView.createConfiguredTarget(SkyframeBuildView.java:1308)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:385)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.compute(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:312)
at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:461)
at com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.AbstractQueueVisitor$WrappedRunnable.run(AbstractQueueVisitor.java:414)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask$RunnableExecuteAction.exec(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(Unknown Source)
What operating system are you running Bazel on?
MacOs, Windows
What's the output of bazel info release?
❯ bazel info release
release 7.2.1
If bazel info release returns "development version" or "(@non-git)", tell us how you built Bazel.
NA
What version of rules_cc do you use? Can you paste the workspace rule used to fetch rules_cc? What other relevant dependencies does your project have?
Native, none.
What Bazel options do you use to trigger the issue? What C++ toolchain do you use?
None, native.
Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?
No.