calibration problem
Closed this issue · 4 comments
dariodenardi commented
Hi,
I have two cameras BlackFly S. I calibrated them and I put the file into the default path. When I run two cameras the files of calibration are read by ROS. In fact, when I write in a new terminal:
ros2 topic echo /cam_0/camera_info
I can see the values. But the images of the camera are published without considering these values. Is there a way to do this or do I have to do it myself?
berndpfrommer commented
Sorry, but what do you mean with "not considering the value". All you can
expect is the driver to publish camera info and image.
…On Sun, Feb 5, 2023, 4:04 PM Dario De Nardi ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
I have two cameras BlackFly S. I calibrated them and I put the file into
the default path. When I run two cameras the files of calibration are read
by ROS. In fact, when I write in a new terminal:
ros2 topic echo /cam_0/camera_info
I can see the values. But the images of the camera are published without
considering these values. Is there a way to do this or do I have to do it
myself?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#32>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPLK2RHAGKXLUXVQFKHYGTWWAIXTANCNFSM6AAAAAAUR7K7IA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
dariodenardi commented
it seems to me that it doesn't work. there can be any value in the file but the image is always the same.
berndpfrommer commented
The driver will not rectify or modify the image in any form. Downstream
software can use the camera info to modify the image as needed.
…On Sun, Feb 5, 2023, 6:15 PM Dario De Nardi ***@***.***> wrote:
it seems to me that it doesn't work. there can be any value in the file
but the image is always the same.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#32 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPLK2QJFK2C5UPSWJRRAE3WWAX7JANCNFSM6AAAAAAUR7K7IA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
dariodenardi commented
Thank you for the explanation