bnjmacdonald/antinaturalistic-fallacy
Survey experiment on antinaturalistic fallacy towards clean meat products
R
Issues
- 0
breakdown willingness-to-pay by subgroup
#31 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 1
examine what kinds of individuals are susceptible to the naturalistic fallacy
#6 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 0
examine open-ended responses on attitudes towards clean meat in more detail
#15 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
examine whether *embrace unnatural* appeal severed the negative relationship between interest and naturalness concerns
#18 opened by bnjmacdonald - 2
examine WTP effects broken down by subgroups
#19 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
examine whether relationship between interest and naturalness is driven by becoming concerned or becoming unconcerned
#20 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 0
- 0
replicate all results with outliers removed
#23 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
elaborate on how practitioners should update their behavior based on our findings
#24 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
elaborate on cognitive mechanisms that might drive the observed effects of the appeals
#25 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 0
add description of exact survey timeline
#27 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 0
re-format for submission
#29 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 1
As a reader, I want to know why existing work is inadequate to answer your question
#10 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
As a PI, I need to link the numbers in the paper to the R code so that I avoid mistakes
#14 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
As a methods reader, I want to see a balance table so that I am comfortable that randomization worked
#13 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
As a reader, I want to know who the subgroups of high vs. low WTP individuals are so that I can better understand attitudes towards clean meat
#9 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
As a reader, I need a description of the treatment effects in order to interpret the figures
#8 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
sensitivity check: relationship between concerns and interest in wave 1 only
#4 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
remove outliers from FFQ variables
#3 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
- 1
As a reader, I want a clear summary of the main results so that I understand the main takeaways
#17 opened by bnjmacdonald - 1
- 0
As a PI, I need to reestimate the discrete choice analyses using clogit because it is the more appropriate model
#12 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0
As a reader, I want to a clear description of the estimation procedure so that I can interpret the results
#16 opened by bnjmacdonald - 0