Literal <code> block drops white-space

[kimo-k]

Markdown input:

<pre>
<code>
(def newline-should-start
    :here)
</code>
</pre>

Expected output (should work the same as a markdown code-block literal):
"<pre><code>&#40;def newline-should-start\n :here&#41;</code></pre>"

Actual output:
"<pre> <code> (def newline-should-start :here) </code> </pre>"

[borkdude]

I think this should be an upstream issue with markdown-clj?

…

On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 16:44, kimo-k ***@***.***> wrote: Markdown input: <pre> <code> (def newline-should-start :here) </code> </pre> Expected output (should work the same as a markdown code-block literal): "<pre><code>&#40;def newline-should-start\n :here&#41;</code></pre>" Actual output: "<pre> <code> (def newline-should-start :here) </code> </pre>" — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#72>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACFSBTYGZKABIP3WWNB33TYC6X4NAVCNFSM6AAAAAA66NKOI6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE3TOOBUGM3TEOA> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[kimo-k]

Looking over markdown-clj, I think you're right:

https://github.com/yogthos/markdown-clj#limitations

I guess that means quickblog is incompatible with cljs-showcase when it comes to multiline code snippets, since there's no way to write a markdown code block that will emit an html attribute (other than style="lang-clojure"). I wonder what workarounds are possible. Would you consider making quickblog's markdown parser pluggable?

[borkdude]

I'm open to that, but I don't know any markdown parser that is bb compatible other than markdown-clj