Sync JSON-LD context with JSON-LD output from vocab

Question

Sync JSON-LD context with JSON-LD output from vocab

ariutta opened this issue 7 years ago · 6 comments

I had been using a JSON-LD context, but it appears we can generate JSON-LD from our RDFa? Maybe these should be synced.

Answer 1 · 2017-10-11T07:21:02.000Z

It would definitely be good to have these synced, otherwise we are prone to them diverging.

There is a recently published working draft on Microdata that has a section on converting between Microdata, RDFa, and JSON-LD.

Answer 2 · 2017-10-13T00:50:35.000Z

I started trying to sync the BridgeDb vocab with these three items:

datasources_headers.txt (see pretty view), which describes datasources.txt (see pretty view)
Swagger doc for webservice
JSON-LD context for webservice

Action Items:

do the about and datatype columns look correct in datasources_headers.txt?
the response to this webservice query is ENSG00000160791 Ensembl. Is ENSG00000160791 an identifier, an ID or something else? This would be for use in the Swagger doc and JSON-LD context.
what is the IRI for identifier (or whatever we want to call it)? Maybe rdf:ID or schema:identifier (suggested by @AlasdairGray) or biopax:id or http://www.rdaregistry.info/Elements/u/#P60052?
for that same query, is Ensembl an instance of bdb:conventionalName?
if we have multiple instances of CCR5 in a pathway, what name should we use to set ENSG00000160791 and Ensembl as properties of each instance? How about {"dataSourceConventionalName": "ENSG00000160791", "dataSourceIdentifier": "ENSG00000160791"}?

Answer 3 · 2017-10-13T07:38:56.000Z

It might be worth using some Schema terms in the JSON-LD, e.g. schema:identifier. You could look at the Bioschemas specifications [fixed link - AR] for suggestions for marking up various types resources.

Answer 4 · 2017-10-13T17:43:12.000Z

@AlasdairGray, I support using terms from Schema/Bioschemas.

Action Items

Do we have a consensus on using terms from Schema/Bioschemas?
Should there be any bdb terms that are exact matches with terms from Schema/Bioschemas? Is bdb:DataSource an exact match for schema:Dataset?

Answer 5 · 2017-10-18T14:43:43.000Z

bdb:DataSource and schema:Dataset are not exactly the same thing. The bdb:DataSource includes notions of the schema:DataCatalog, which would be the issuer of the identifiers.

The question is then whether they are operationally equivalent for most circumstances?

Answer 6 · 2017-10-18T20:29:43.000Z

Once @egonw finishes up some other deadlines, maybe he can weigh in on bdb:DataSource vs. schema:Dataset vs. schema:DataCatalog. I'm happy to use whatever the rest of the BridgeDb community prefers.