cranchange/cran_change.org

Issues

• Next steps

  #31 opened 3 years ago by MilesMcBain
  11

• Request for an open review criteria

  #8 opened 4 years ago by jonocarroll
  8

• Launch

  #27 opened 3 years ago by MilesMcBain
  30

• A suggestion on governance changes

  #26 opened 3 years ago by atheriel
  6

• Mention resourcing first

  #30 opened 3 years ago by wlandau
  1

• Logo seems informal

  #17 opened 4 years ago by llrs
  32

• create code of conduct

  #16 opened 3 years ago by MilesMcBain
  0

• Evidence of CRAN struggling to scale?

  #23 opened 4 years ago by llrs
  13

• Refocus, point 6 about resubmissions.

  #24 opened 4 years ago by llrs
  5

• Take steps to avoid offending R Core, R Foundation

  #18 opened 4 years ago by MilesMcBain
  1

• Some comments on the letter

  #19 opened 4 years ago by wch
  16

• Getting feedback from broader community

  #13 opened 4 years ago by MilesMcBain
  3

• Move repo to new organisation owner

  #10 opened 4 years ago by MilesMcBain
  10

• Summarize current status and cross-ref resources in README?

  #15 opened 4 years ago by pat-s
  1

• soften intro

  #11 opened 4 years ago by MilesMcBain
  5

• Ask CRAN to identify and quantify the resources it needs.

  #7 opened 4 years ago by wlandau
  11

• Point 2 mentioing current shared build environments and configuration

  #9 opened 4 years ago by llrs
  4

• Strengthen the third sentence

  #4 opened 4 years ago by wlandau
  5

• Separate one list item into two

  #6 opened 4 years ago by wlandau
  0

• Suggest rephrasing second sentence

  #3 opened 4 years ago by wlandau
  0

• Briefly elaborate on the ways that sudden archivals take place

  #5 opened 4 years ago by wlandau
  3