dbpedia/archivo

Handeling slash ontologies correctly

Closed this issue · 0 comments

Right now Archivo does not handle ontologies correctly that not contain the class definitions but link to them (example: DBpedia ontology) via http://open.vocab.org/terms/defines.
That is the reason the difference between the "official" version has much less triples (8035) than the "develop" version (32177).

It should be possible to include the RDF content from the linked Classes/Datatypes etc. (e.g from dbo:Person) in the ontology.