None
Closed this issue · 2 comments
conartist6 commented
Could there be a None production rule? It would simplify implementation of grammars that include epsilon.
dmaevsky commented
Could you give me an example of the grammar that you have in mind?
Is it impossible to describe it with the current tools or just "harder" or
"more verbose"?
…On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 4:31 AM Conrad Buck ***@***.***> wrote:
Could there be a None production rule? It would simplify implementation
of grammars that include epsilon.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADY2MGT7L7A7A6MQWLUS2LRKTR2NANCNFSM4L22VDHA>
.
conartist6 commented
It's fine, I can just distribute optional. I mostly liked the idea of having my grammar follow the spec as closely as possible.