TableBank is a new image-based table detection and recognition dataset built with novel weak supervision from Word and Latex documents on the internet, contains 417K high-quality labeled tables.
- We have uploaded the datasets on HuggingFace.
- We update the license to Apache-2.0.
- We release an official split for the train/val/test datasets and re-train both of the Table Detection and Table Structure Recognition models using Detectron2 and OpenNMT tools. The benchmark results, the MODEL ZOO, and the download link of TableBank have been updated.
- A new benchmark dataset DocBank (Paper, Repo) is now available for document layout analysis
- Our data can only be used for research purpose
- Our paper has been accepted in LREC 2020
To address the need for a standard open domain table benchmark dataset, we propose a novel weak supervision approach to automatically create the TableBank, which is orders of magnitude larger than existing human labeled datasets for table analysis. Distinct from traditional weakly supervised training set, our approach can obtain not only large scale but also high quality training data.
Nowadays, there are a great number of electronic documents on the web such as Microsoft Word (.docx) and Latex (.tex) files. These online documents contain mark-up tags for tables in their source code by nature. Intuitively, we can manipulate these source code by adding bounding box using the mark-up language within each document. For Word documents, the internal Office XML code can be modified where the borderline of each table is identified. For Latex documents, the tex code can be also modified where bounding boxes of tables are recognized. In this way, high-quality labeled data is created for a variety of domains such as business documents, official fillings, research papers etc, which is tremendously beneficial for large-scale table analysis tasks.
The TableBank dataset totally consists of 417,234 high quality labeled tables as well as their original documents in a variety of domains.
| Task | Word | Latex | Word+Latex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Table detection | 163,417 | 253,817 | 417,234 |
| Table structure recognition | 56,866 | 88,597 | 145,463 |
| Task | Word | Latex | Word+Latex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Table detection | 78,399 | 200,183 | 278,582 |
| Table structure recognition | 56,866 | 88,597 | 145,463 |
| Source | Train | Val | Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latex | 187199 | 7265 | 5719 |
| Word | 73383 | 2735 | 2281 |
| Total | 260582 | 10000 | 8000 |
| Source | Train | Val | Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latex | 79486 | 6075 | 3036 |
| Word | 50977 | 3925 | 1964 |
| Total | 130463 | 10000 | 5000 |
Table detection aims to locate tables using bounding boxes in a document. Given a document page in the image format, generating several bounding box that represents the location of tables in this page.
Table structure recognition aims to identify the row and column layout structure for the tables especially in non-digital document formats such as scanned images. Given a table in the image format, generating an HTML tag sequence that represents the arrangement of rows and columns as well as the type of table cells.
To verify the effectiveness of Table-Bank, we build several strong baselines using the state-of-the-art models with end-to-end deep neural networks. The table detection model is based on the Faster R-CNN [Ren et al., 2015] architecture with different settings. The table structure recognition model is based on the encoder-decoder framework for image-to-text.
To evaluate table detection, we sample 18,000 document images from Word and Latex documents, where 10,000 images for validation and 8,000 images for testing. Each sampled image contains at least one table. Meanwhile, we also evaluate our model on the ICDAR 2013 dataset to verify the effectiveness of TableBank. To evaluate table structure recognition, we sample 15,000 table images from Word and Latex documents, where 10,000 images for validation and 5,000 images for testing. For table detection, we calculate the precision, recall and F1 in the way described in our paper, where the metrics for all documents are computed by summing up the area of overlap, prediction and ground truth. For table structure recognition, we use the 4-gram BLEU score as the evaluation metric with a single reference.
We use the open-source framework Detectron2 [Wu et al., 2019] to train models on the TableBank. Detectron2 is a high-quality and high-performance codebase for object detection research, which supports many state-of-the-art algorithms. In this task, we use the Faster R-CNN algorithm with the ResNeXt [Xie et al., 2016] as the backbone network architecture, where the parameters are pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset. All baselines are trained using 4 V100 NVIDIA GPUs using data-parallel sync SGD with a minibatch size of 20 images. For other parameters, we use the default values in Detectron2. During testing, the confidence threshold of generating bounding boxes is set to 90%.
| Models | Word | Latex | Word+Latex | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | Precision | Recall | F1 | |
| X101(Word) | 0.9352 | 0.9398 | 0.9375 | 0.9905 | 0.5851 | 0.7356 | 0.9579 | 0.7474 | 0.8397 |
| X152(Word) | 0.9418 | 0.9415 | 0.9416 | 0.9912 | 0.6882 | 0.8124 | 0.9641 | 0.8041 | 0.8769 |
| X101(Latex) | 0.8453 | 0.9335 | 0.8872 | 0.9819 | 0.9799 | 0.9809 | 0.9159 | 0.9587 | 0.9368 |
| X152(Latex) | 0.8476 | 0.9264 | 0.8853 | 0.9816 | 0.9814 | 0.9815 | 0.9173 | 0.9562 | 0.9364 |
| X101(Word+Latex) | 0.9178 | 0.9363 | 0.9270 | 0.9827 | 0.9784 | 0.9806 | 0.9526 | 0.9592 | 0.9559 |
| X152(Word+Latex) | 0.9229 | 0.9266 | 0.9247 | 0.9837 | 0.9752 | 0.9795 | 0.9557 | 0.9530 | 0.9543 |
For table structure recognition, we use the open-source framework OpenNMT [Klein et al., 2017] to train the image-to-text model. OpenNMT is mainly designed for neural machine translation, which supports many encoder-decoder frameworks. In this task, we train our model using the image-to-text method in OpenNMT. The model is also trained using 4 V100 NVIDIA GPUs with the learning rate of 1 and batch size of 24. For other parameters, we use the default values in OpenNMT.
| Models | Word | Latex | Word+Latex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Image-to-Text (Word) | 59.18 | 69.76 | 65.75 |
| Image-to-Text (Latex) | 51.45 | 71.63 | 63.08 |
| Image-to-Text (Word+Latex) | 69.93 | 77.94 | 74.54 |
The trained models are available for download in the TableBank Model Zoo.
**Please DO NOT re-distribute our data.**
If you use the corpus in published work, please cite it referring to the "Paper and Citation" Section.
The annotations and original document pictures of the TableBank dataset can be download from HuggingFace.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01949
@misc{li2019tablebank,
title={TableBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Table Detection and Recognition},
author={Minghao Li and Lei Cui and Shaohan Huang and Furu Wei and Ming Zhou and Zhoujun Li},
year={2019},
eprint={1903.01949},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CV}
}
- [Ren et al., 2015] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross B. Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. CoRR, abs/1506.01497, 2015.
- [Gilani et al., 2017] A. Gilani, S. R. Qasim, I. Malik, and F. Shafait. Table detection using deep learning. In Proc. of ICDAR 2017, volume 01, pages 771–776, Nov 2017.
- [Wu et al., 2019] Y Wu, A Kirillov, F Massa, WY Lo, R Girshick. Detectron2[J]. 2019.
- [Xie et al., 2016] Saining Xie, Ross B. Girshick, Piotr Doll´ar, Zhuowen Tu, and Kaiming He. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. CoRR, abs/1611.05431, 2016.
- [Klein et al., 2017] Guillaume Klein, Yoon Kim, Yuntian Deng, Jean Senellart, and Alexander M. Rush. Open-NMT: Open-source toolkit for neural machine translation. In Proc. of ACL, 2017.]