dominictarr/mux-demux

Issues

• [Question] Is this an ok implementation?

  #33 opened 6 years ago by Industrial
  1

• muxDemux.close not working when called after mxConn

  #36 opened 9 years ago by zetxx
  1

• Doesn't work with child process pipes?

  #34 opened 10 years ago by tlrobinson
  3

• Unpipe a mux-demux stream.

  #32 opened 10 years ago by Industrial
  4

• mux-demux streams can't be fed buffers

  #2 opened 12 years ago by garthk
  10

• The argument 'meta' is not explained in the readme

  #31 opened 11 years ago by kumavis
  2

• proposal for new syntax

  #21 opened 12 years ago by juliangruber
  8

• binary

  #26 opened 11 years ago by juliangruber
  8

• muxdemux does not respect pause behaviour

  #18 opened 11 years ago by Raynos
  2

• idea: tighter protocol

  #14 opened 12 years ago by dominictarr
  4

• Npm install of mux-demux has a dependancy on git

  #30 opened 11 years ago by sbusa
  5

• Example in README won't work on node 0.10.x

  #28 opened 11 years ago by Floby
  3

• Testling CI is all red

  #25 opened 12 years ago by subtleGradient
  2

• Doesn't play nice with newer Stream API

  #24 opened 12 years ago by rmg
  14

• proposal for new syntax (II)

  #22 opened 12 years ago by juliangruber
  11

• only write on .pipe

  #23 opened 12 years ago by juliangruber
  4

• Make Streams identifyable over to the Connection where it comes out

  #20 opened 12 years ago by geNAZt
  4

• use readable-stream

  #15 opened 12 years ago by Raynos
  12

• ideas: use .createStream() at both ends.

  #13 opened 12 years ago by dominictarr
  2

• mux-demux tries to write to stream after it's closed

  #7 opened 12 years ago by Raynos
  6