ethereum/pm

Proposal to add EIP-3322 in London

Closed this issue · 8 comments

wjmelements commented

EIP-3322 can be discussed as another alternative to EIP-3298 and EIP-3300. It should be discussable in the same 15-minute time frame.

ethereum/EIPs#3322

timbeiko commented

@wjmelements added to the next call's agenda given how little time we had to discuss today: https://github.com/ethereum/pm/blob/master/README.md#acd-108-march-19-2021

shemnon commented

Adding 3 new opcodes and a 5th item to track with every account is too much for London. If it were to target Shanghai we could discuss the merits, but the timeframe makes this a non-starter because of complexity.

wjmelements commented

Adding 3 new opcodes and a 5th item to track with every account is too much for London. If it were to target Shanghai we could discuss the merits, but the timeframe makes this a non-starter because of complexity.

Please respect the discussions-to url https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-3322-efficient-gas-storage/5470

shemnon commented

If I were to discuss the merits that would be a good target, but this is covering the question as to whether or not it should be considered for London, which is orthogonal to the actual content of the EIP.

wjmelements commented
timbeiko commented

Closing this because on ACD 108 (#288) it was deemed too complex for London by several client teams (and had some teams fully opposed). See conversation at 42:35. Other relevant conversations at 29:23, 30:52, 37:17 and 40:36.

tuanggolt commented

open

timbeiko commented

@tuanggolt do you have a reason to re-open this issue?