Simple and complete Solid DOM testing utilities that encourage good testing practices.
Inspired completely by preact-testing-library
You want to write tests for your Solid components so that they avoid including implementation details, and are maintainable in the long run.
The Solid Testing Library is a very lightweight solution for testing Solid components. Its primary guiding principle is:
The more your tests resemble the way your software is used, the more confidence they can give you.
This module is distributed via npm which is bundled with node and should be installed
as one of your project's devDependencies:
npm install --save-dev @solidjs/testing-libraryIf you using Jest we recommend using solid-jest to properly resolve the browser version of Solid as Jest will default to the server version when run in Node.
💡 If you are using Jest or vitest, you may also be interested in installing @testing-library/jest-dom so you can use
the custom jest matchers.
A working Vite template setup with solid-testing-library and TypeScript support can be found here.
See the docs over at the Testing Library website.
There are several key differences, though:
render function takes in a function that returns a Solid Component, rather than simply the component itself.
// With @testing-library/preact
const results = render(<YourComponent />, options);// With solid-testing-library
const results = render(() => <YourComponent />, options);rerender method. You can use global signals to manipulate your test component in a way that causes it to update.
Solid.js reactive changes are pretty instantaneous, so there is rarely need to use waitFor(…), await findByRole(…) and other asynchronous queries to test the rendered result, except for transitions, suspense, resources and router navigation.
location and routeDataFunc options that will set up a router with memory integration pointing at a certain path if location is given and primed with the routeDataFunc as data. Since this setup is not instantaneous, you need to first use asynchronous queries (findBy) after employing it:
it('uses params', async () => {
const App = () => (
<Routes>
<Route path="/ids/:id" component={() => <p>Id: {useParams()?.id}</p>} />
<Route path="/" component={() => <p>Start</p>} />
</Routes>
);
const { findByText } = render(() => <App />, { location: "ids/1234" });
expect(await findByText("Id: 1234")).not.toBeFalsy();
});It uses @solidjs/router, so if you want to use a different router, you should consider the wrapper option instead. If you attempt to use this without having the package installed, you will receive an error message.
renderHook call has no container, baseElement or queries in its options or return value. Instead, it has an owner to be used with runWithOwner if required. It also exposes a cleanup function, though this is already automatically called after the test is finished.
function renderHook<Args extends any[], Result>(
hook: (...args: Args) => Result,
options: {
initialProps?: Args,
wrapper?: Component<{ children: JSX.Element }>
}
) => {
result: Result;
owner: Owner | null;
cleanup: () => void;
}This can be used to easily test a hook / primitive:
const { result } = renderHook(createResult);
expect(result).toBe(true);If you are using a wrapper with renderHook, make sure it will always return props.children - especially if you are using a context with asynchronous code together with <Show>, because this is required to get the value from the hook and it is only obtained synchronously once and you will otherwise only get undefined and wonder why this is the case.
renderDirective call, which augments renderHook to take a directive as first argument, accept an initialValue for the argument and a targetElement (string, HTMLElement or function returning a HTMLElement) in the options and also returns arg and setArg to read and manipulate the argument of the directive.
function renderDirective<
Arg extends any,
Elem extends HTMLElement
>(
directive: (ref: Elem, arg: Accessor<Arg>) => void,
options?: {
...renderOptions,
initialValue: Arg,
targetElement:
| Lowercase<Elem['nodeName']>
| Elem
| (() => Elem)
}
): Result & { arg: Accessor<Arg>, setArg: Setter<Arg> };This allows for very effective and concise testing of directives:
const { asFragment, setArg } = renderDirective(myDirective);
expect(asFragment()).toBe(
'<div data-directive="works"></div>'
);
setArg("perfect");
expect(asFragment()).toBe(
'<div data-directive="perfect"></div>'
);createEffect. While you can use waitFor to test asynchronous effects, it uses polling instead of allowing Solid's reactivity to trigger the next step. In order to simplify testing those asynchronous effects, we have a testEffect helper that complements the hooks for directives and hooks:
testEffect(fn: (done: (result: T) => void) => void, owner?: Owner): Promise<T>
// use it like this:
test("testEffect allows testing an effect asynchronously", () => {
const [value, setValue] = createSignal(0);
return testEffect(done => createEffect((run: number = 0) => {
if (run === 0) {
expect(value()).toBe(0);
setValue(1);
} else if (run === 1) {
expect(value()).toBe(1);
done();
}
return run + 1;
}));
});It allows running the effect inside a defined owner that is received as an optional second argument. This can be useful in combination with renderHook, which gives you an owner field in its result. The return value is a Promise with the value given to the done() callback. You can either await the result for further assertions or return it to your test runner.
If you find any issues, please check on the issues page if they are already known. If not, opening an issue will be much appreciated, even more so if it contains a
- short description
- minimal reproduction code
- list of possible workarounds, if there are any
If you think you can fix an issue yourself, feel free to open a pull-request. If functionality changes, please don't forget to add or adapt tests.
If you are using vitest, then tests might fail, because the packages solid-js, and @solidjs/router (if used) need to be loaded only once, and they could be loaded both through the internal vite server and through node. Typical bugs that happen because of this is that dispose is supposedly undefined, or the router could not be loaded.
There are three ways you could attempt to work around this problem. If they work depends on your version of vitest, which version of node-js and what package manager you use (some of them change the way node resolves modules):
// this is inside your vite(st) config:
{
test: {
deps: {
// 1nd way: remove the @solidjs/router part if you do not use it:
inline: [/solid-js/, /@solidjs\/router/],
// 2st way
registerNodeLoader: false,
},
// 3rd way: alias the resolution
resolve: {
alias: {
"solid-js": "node_modules/solid-js/dist/dev.js",
// only needed if the router is used:
"@solidjs/router": "node_modules/@solidjs/router/index.jsx",
},
},
},
}At the moment of writing this, the 1st way seems to be the most reliable for the default solid template. Solid-start's vite plugin might need a different configuration.
Thanks goes to Kent C. Dodds and his colleagues for creating testing-library and to the creators of preact-testing-library.
This library has been created by Ryan Carniato and is currently maintained by Alex Lohr.