How to add "spm" into river(GETM)?

[RuoLinCunJi]

Dear Jorn
I am coupling the FABM to the hydrodynamic mode GETM. I tried to add the variable spm to the stream file for the pattern input. But the model results do not show spm from rivers. The following is the matlab code that I added spm in the river nc file.
Thank you for your answer!

[bolding]

Hi Ruo I know Jorn is travelling - but I think the answer he gave in August is still valid - with the exception this ia about a specific physical driver model. Best regards Karsten Den fre. 9. dec. 2022 kl. 08.54 skrev Ruo.L ***@***.***>:

…

Dear Jorn I am coupling the FABM to the hydrodynamic mode GETM. I tried to add the variable spm to the stream file for the pattern input. But the model results do not show spm from rivers. The following is the matlab code that I added spm in the river nc file. Thank you for your answer! [image: 4d82a382c71db6100ccf641bedb1bc1] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108501826/206652379-5294f387-98a4-45a9-8908-1f962a43994a.png> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACVA42LFPUMCB657CWSJ35DWMLQUJANCNFSM6AAAAAASZBM5VM> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Karsten Bolding ***@***.*** +4564422058

[RuoLinCunJi]

Dear Karsten

Thank you for your quick answer very much!
I'm not quite sure what you mean. It is okay for me to add bb_passive_into the river, but spm cannot do it. Is this because of the difference between the two modules? Is there a way for the spm module to output from the river, like bb_passive?

Best regards
R.Lin

[bolding]

Hi Ruo What I mean is that this a GETM question and should be asked to the GETM people. FABM does not know anything about how individual driver models handle e.g. rivers. Best regards, Karsten Den fre. 9. dec. 2022 kl. 12.21 skrev Ruo.L ***@***.***>:

…

Dear Karsten Thank you for your quick answer very much! I'm not quite sure what you mean. It is okay for me to add bb_passive_into the river, but spm cannot do it. Is this because of the difference between the two modules? Is there a way for the spm module to output from the river, like bb_passive? Best regards R.Lin — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#30 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACVA42PSU7G6WCDVOX3AEV3WMMI2XANCNFSM6AAAAAASZBM5VM> . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Karsten Bolding ***@***.*** +4564422058

[RuoLinCunJi]

Dear Karsten
Thank you for your answer.
I will ask this question to GETM-users.

Bests
R.Lin