Missing User Channel Tests

[robmoffat]

Just looking at the spec rn and we have a few tests in 2.0 for user channels that aren't implemented:

UCFilteredUsageJoin
UCFilteredUsageNoJoin

Could you and @ gaganahluwalia take a look?

thanks!

[kriswest]

also these are still hanging out waiting for you @rob Moffat ***@***.***> finos/FDC3#864 finos/FDC3#865 They'll need merging into/integrating into your updated file format for the tests. 2.0 doessn't need amintainer review as its going into another PR they need to accept (your one). K

…

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 16:01, Rob Moffat ***@***.***> wrote: Just looking at the spec rn and we have a few tests in 2.0 for user channels that aren't implemented: UCFilteredUsageJoin UCFilteredUsageNoJoin Could you and @ gaganahluwalia take a look? thanks! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#169>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM7PBBSZWC7HVJVWLPQ24DWSVWEXANCNFSM6AAAAAAT444PKI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Kris West *he • him* *Principal Engineer* [image: Finsemble] <https://finsemble.com/> ***@***.*** finsemble.com

[Joe-Dunleavy]

@robmoffat UCFilteredUsageJoin is there it's just under the name of UCFilteredUsageLeave, which should show up as a duplicate but is actually two different tests. The other one I can't find it anywhere.

Gagan and I will fix these today

[Joe-Dunleavy]

@robmoffat UCFilteredUsageNoJoin is actually a duplicate of BasicCH2, which would explain why it's not there. We can remove UCFilteredUsageNoJoin from the test definitions

[Joe-Dunleavy]

Fixed: #171