Flexible, dynamic fields and nested models for Django REST Framework serializers. Works with both Python 2 and 3.
FlexFields (DRF-FF) for Django REST Framework is a package designed to provide a common baseline of functionality for dynamically setting fields and nested models within DRF serializers. To remove unneeded fields, you can dynamically set fields, including nested fields, via URL parameters (?fields=name,address.zip)
or when configuring serializers. Additionally, you can dynamically expand fields from simple values to complex nested models, or treat fields as "deferred", and expand them on an as-needed basis.
This package is designed for simplicity and provides two classes - a viewset class and a serializer class (or mixin) - with minimal magic and entanglement with DRF's foundational classes. Unless DRF makes significant changes to its serializers, you can count on this package to work (and if major changes are made, this package will be updated shortly thereafter). If you are familar with Django REST Framework, it shouldn't take you long to read over the code and see how it works.
There are similar packages, such as the powerful Dynamic REST, which does what this package does and more, but you may not need all those bells and whistles. There is also the more basic Dynamic Fields Mixin, but it lacks functionality for field expansion and dot-notation field customiziation.
Table of Contents:
- Installation
- Requirements
- Basics
- Dynamic Field Expansion
- Dynamically Setting Fields
- Combining Dynamically-Set Fields and Field Expansion
- Serializer Introspection
- Change Log
- Testing
- License
pip install drf-flex-fields
- Python (2.7, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5)
- Django (1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 2.0)
To use this package's functionality, your serializers need to subclass FlexFieldsModelSerializer
or use the provided FlexFieldsSerializerMixin
. If you would like built-in protection for controlling when clients are allowed to expand resources when listing resource collections, your viewsets need to subclass FlexFieldsModelViewSet
.
from rest_flex_fields import FlexFieldsModelViewSet, FlexFieldsModelSerializer
class PersonViewSet(FlexFieldsModelViewSet):
queryset = models.Person.objects.all()
serializer_class = PersonSerializer
# Whitelist fields that can be expanding when listing resources
permit_list_expands = ['country']
class CountrySerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Country
fields = ('id', 'name', 'population')
class PersonSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Person
fields = ('id', 'name', 'country', 'occupation')
expandable_fields = {
'country': (CountrySerializer, {'source': 'country'})
}
Now you can make requests like GET /person?expand=country&fields=id,name,country
to dynamically manipulate which fields are included, as well as expand primitive fields into nested objects. You can also use dot notation to control both the fields
and expand
settings at arbitrary levels of depth in your serialized responses. Read on to learn the details and see more complex examples.
✔️ The examples below subclass FlexFieldsModelSerializer
, but the same can be accomplished by mixing in FlexFieldsSerializerMixin
, which is also importable from the same rest_flex_fields
package.
To define an expandable field, add it to the expandable_fields
within your serializer:
class CountrySerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Country
fields = ['name', 'population']
class PersonSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
country = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True, read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Person
fields = ['id', 'name', 'country', 'occupation']
expandable_fields = {
'country': (CountrySerializer, {'source': 'country', 'fields': ['name']})
}
If the default serialized response is the following:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : 12,
"occupation" : "Programmer",
}
When you do a GET /person/13322?expand=country
, the response will change to:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States"
},
"occupation" : "Programmer",
}
Notice how population
was ommitted from the nested country
object. This is because fields
was set to ['name']
when passed to the embedded CountrySerializer
. You will learn more about this later on.
Alternatively, you could treat country
as a "deferred" field by not defining it among the default fields. To make a field deferred, only define it within the serializer's expandable_fields
.
Let's say you add StateSerializer
as serializer nested inside the country serializer above:
class StateSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = State
fields = ['name', 'population']
class CountrySerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Country
fields = ['name', 'population']
expandable_fields = {
'states': (StateSerializer, {'source': 'states', 'many': True})
}
class PersonSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
country = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True, read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Person
fields = ['id', 'name', 'country', 'occupation']
expandable_fields = {
'country': (CountrySerializer, {'source': 'country', 'fields': ['name']})
}
Your default serialized response might be the following for person
and country
, respectively:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : 12,
"occupation" : "Programmer",
}
{
"id" : 12,
"name" : "United States",
"states" : "http://www.api.com/countries/12/states"
}
But if you do a GET /person/13322?expand=country.states
, it would be:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"occupation" : "Programmer",
"country" : {
"id" : 12,
"name" : "United States",
"states" : [
{
"name" : "Ohio",
"population": 11000000
}
]
}
}
Please be kind to your database, as this could incur many additional queries. Though, you can mitigate this impact through judicious use of prefetch_related
and select_related
when defining the queryset for your viewset.
You could accomplish the same result (expanding the states
field within the embedded country serializer) by explicitly passing the expand
option within your serializer:
class PersonSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Person
fields = ['id', 'name', 'country', 'occupation']
expandable_fields = {
'country': (CountrySerializer, {'source': 'country', 'expand': ['states']})
}
By default, when subclassing FlexFieldsModelViewSet
, you can only expand fields when you are retrieving single resources, in order to protect yourself from careless clients. However, if you would like to make a field expandable even when listing collections, you can add the field's name to the permit_list_expands
property on the viewset. Just make sure you are wisely using select_related
and prefect_related
in the viewset's queryset. You can take advantage of a utility function, is_expanded
to adjust the queryset accordingly.
Example:
from drf_flex_fields import is_expanded
class PersonViewSet(FlexFieldsModelViewSet):
permit_list_expands = ['employer']
queryset = models.Person.objects.all().select_related('employer')
serializer_class = PersonSerializer
def get_queryset(self):
if is_expanded(self.request, 'employer'):
models.Person.objects.all().select_related('employer')
return models.Person.objects.all()
You can set expand=~all
to automatically expand all fields that are available for expansion. This will take effect for only the top-level serializer; if you need to also expand fields that are present on deeply nested models, then you will need to explicitly pass their values using dot notation.
You can dynamically set fields, with the configuration originating from the URL parameters or serializer options.
Consider this as a default serialized response:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States",
"population": 330000000
},
"occupation" : "Programmer",
"hobbies" : ["rock climbing", "sipping coffee"]
}
To whittle down the fields via URL parameters, simply add ?fields=id,name,country
to your requests to get back:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States",
"population: 330000000
}
}
Or, for more specificity, you can use dot-notation, ?fields=id,name,country.name
:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States",
}
}
You could accomplish the same outcome as the example above by passing options to your serializers. With this approach, you lose runtime dynamism, but gain the ability to re-use serializers, rather than creating a simplified copy of a serializer for the purposes of embedding it.
from rest_flex_fields import FlexFieldsModelSerializer
class CountrySerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Country
fields = ['id', 'name', 'population']
class PersonSerializer(FlexFieldsModelSerializer):
country: CountrySerializer(fields=['name'])
class Meta:
model = Person
fields = ['id', 'name', 'country', 'occupation', 'hobbies']
serializer = PersonSerializer(person, fields=["id", "name", "country.name"])
print(serializer.data)
>>>{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States",
}
}
You may be wondering how things work if you use both the expand
and fields
option, and there is overlap. For example, your serialized person model may look like the following by default:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe",
"country" : {
"name" : "United States",
}
}
However, you make the following request HTTP GET /person/13322?include=id,name&expand=country
. You will get the following back:
{
"id" : 13322,
"name" : "John Doe"
}
The include
field takes precedence over expand
. That is, if a field is not among the set that is explicitly alllowed, it cannot be expanded. If such a conflict occurs, you will not pay for the extra database queries - the expanded field will be silently abandoned.
When using an instance of FlexFieldsModelSerializer
, you can examine the property expanded_fields
to discover which, if any, fields have been dynamically expanded.
- Handle case where
request
isNone
when accessing request object from serializer. Thanks @jsatt!
- Exposes
FlexFieldsSerializerMixin
in addition toFlexFieldsModelSerializer
. Thanks @jsatt!
Tests are found in a simplified DRF project in the /tests
folder. Install the project requirements and do ./manage.py test
to run them.
See License.