gauge-sh/tach

'tach test' should return exit code zero when no tests run

emdoyle opened this issue · 2 comments

Right now, if tach test determines that all tests can be skipped, the exit code from pytest is 5. This might mean that we should adjust the way the plugin operates (there may be a more native way to indicate tests should be skipped), adjust pytest's configuration, or maybe we need to diverge from pytest's behavior here and manually return zero in this case.

Example:

.venv/bin/tach test
============ Cached results found!  ============
==================================================== test session starts =====================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.12.3, pytest-8.2.2, pluggy-1.5.0
rootdir: /home/evan/Programming/tach
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: mock-3.14.0
collected 85 items                                                                                                           
[Tach] Skipped 10 test files (85 tests) since they were unaffected by current changes.
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_affected_modules.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_parsing.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_check.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_file_tree.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_module_tree.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_cli.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_changed_files.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_report.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_imports.py'
[Tach] > Skipped '/home/evan/Programming/tach/python/tests/test_cache.py'

=================================================== no tests ran in 0.28s ====================================================
============ END Cached results  ============
make: *** [Makefile:41: test] Error 5

Can you assign me this

@tiluckdave I think one at a time is best, given you are already working on #169. I think I will tackle this one since it's been bugging me in my pre-commit hook.