Bark

Bark is supposed to be a small and easy-to-use library that uses PostgreSQL for collecting logs from multiple sources. It has a web server which can accept the logs using REST calls and for that reason we can run the server separately and can use client library (in progress) to send the logs to the server. But why are we writing yet another logger, aren't there many more already?

Introduction to the problem

When we start off with smaller projects, logging is not an issue. You either do a fmt.Println or a log.Print and view and search for text in text files. However, as the app or the organisation grows in size and start creating multiple services and start logging more things, logging becomes more and more problematic. Filtering inside a log file becomes more difficult. Co-relating logs to form a single, isolated flow of events becomes a problem too. Sorting and searching that information across multiple large log files and keeping track of line numbers becomes confusing and debugging with the help of logs becomes a nightmare.

Now, there are pretty great projects, both open and proprietary out there that make log collection, search and analytics on terabyte scale possible. However, there are a few problems that we can observer:

The more capable ones are either more costly, or more complex, or sometimes both.
Setting up a dedicated logging solution is not always easy or possible given various constraints like time and manpower, testability, locality of data, cost, required expertise for the selected solution etc.)
Then comes the learning curve of querying - different solutions have different query languages and varying nuances between them all.

So it takes time to install, configure and learn such solutions.

However, between the basic HTTP server and the enterprise scale, as we grow, we still need to be able to store, process, analyze and search through our logs.

Aim of this project

Bark aims to fill the gap that exists between simple file-based logging and a large log aggregation solution. Without Bark, a single developer or a small team working on a project would have to go through all the complex setup of an enterprise-level logging solution which they probably don't need or want at the outset.

Bark is:

Easy to setup: We use PostgreSQL for storing logs. It is cross-platform and installing it is easy. You probably already have it installed for your other services anyway!
Easy to configure: You just need to create a new database (or use an existing one), create a new table and start a server. That's it.
Easy (or nothing) to learn: You probably already know SQL. You can use that knowledge to filter and analyze all your logs! There is nothing new to learn.

Ease of purging irrelevant logs

When the time comes, you can search through your logs as needed. You can dispose off anything that's unnecessary in one way or the other. For example, with Bark, you can easily do something like this :

Delete logs that are more than 3 months old: Useful for saving storage
Delete all logs that are of INFO level: Useful when you want to delete all logs which do not represent any kind of failure or danger.
Delete all logs that are either INFO or WARNING level and were sent by pdf_printer service between the dates: 2023-06-03 and 2023-06-09: Useful when you know you had a problem that caused enormous amounts of logs to be emitted but the problem is solved now!
Delete everything older than a month except the ones with code ABCDEF: Useful when you wanna clear off old logs but leave some for looking deeper into an old problem.

All of these are very easily doable using SQL!

We want this service to be available as a web service which can be called by other services to send in the log entries. Bark also aims to include a library which can be included in your golang project and be called from within the project using just a function.

Caveat

Bark is supposed to scale alongside you till a point. Bark uses PostgreSQL for storing logs and is thus pretty performant.

However, it is worth noting that PostgreSQL is not designed to store enormous amounts of time-series data. But PostgreSQL is just good enough for mid-size installations (say about a dozen services) that has not gone global yet. So bark is not aimed at becoming the most powerful and flexible log aggregation service but useful enough for searching and filtering logs.

Language of Choice

It has to be written in golang for the sake of being great at handling incoming traffic bursts, lining up the logs and sending them in a load-controlled manner to PostgreSQL (because PostgreSQL is not optimized for that kinda stuff).

Installation and Usage

Prerequisite

Go (Golang) version 1.20+
PostgreSQL database version 12+

Installation

Install it yourself

If you have go version 1.20 or above installed, following are the steps to set up Bark on a machine after cloning the repository:

Set the appropriate value for BARK_DATABASE_URL environment variable. The BARK_DATABASE_URL should be of the format postgres://username:password@host:port/db?sslmode=disable. For example: export BARK_DATABASE_URL="postgres://vaibhav:mypassword@127.0.0.1:5432/log_db?sslmode=disable"
Navigate to the directory containing the go.mod file.
~~Install the dependencies using the command go get .~~ The dependencies are included in the vendor directory in the codebase, so you don't need to install them separately.
To create the required tables navigate to the _nocode/db/migrations folder. Copy SQL commands from all the .up.sql, and run them in the psql terminal. Or you can use a migration tool like golang-migrate
Run the bark server using the command go run main.go

To test if the library is up and running as expected, open a browser and navigate to the URL: localhost:8080/hello/vaibhav

You should see a text rendered on your browser saying Hello, vaibhav!

Get it from Docker

You can pull bark using docker as well:

docker pull techrail/bark:0.1

Or you can directly run it using:

docker run techrail/bark:0.1

Run using Docker Compose

Or you can use Docker Compose to run it. Once you have cloned the repository, you can run:

docker-compose up

And it should start running. You can then visit http://localhost:18080/hello/vaibhav and you should be greeted with the Hello, vaibhav! message!

NOTE: Please bear with us as we work fixing the docker versions.

What is it NOT?

It is not a replacement for Plaintext logs - Bark should be able to write to a plaintext log file in parallel to throwing items into Postgres. In case Bark server cannot write to the database, it will emit your log messages on the server's STDOUT.
It is not an APM - We don't want to throw in Application uptime or Performance Monitoring. Bark is not supposed to be a monitoring solution at all.
It is not trying to replace any Terabyte-scale log aggregation service - e.g. ELK Stack, NewRelic, DataDog etc. are dedicated more towards enterprise requirements and have capability to handle terabytes of logs. Bark does not aim to act as a replacement of such services. It aims to be the stepping stone between plaintext and terabyte-scale, enterprise-ready solutions.
It is not a CLI tool or a Web server at this point - Bark, at this time does not offer a Web Service or a CLI tool to view, filter or tail your logs. For that you would have to run a query against PostgreSQL directly using your terminal or GUI tool of your choice (tailing on logs might not be possible though).

A note of thanks

Bark won't be here without the contributions we have gotten so far. Not would it be able to say beautifully that Logs are beautiful without the Social Media Preview and cover image Photo by Lora Ninova on Unsplash!

gautam8404/bark