Linux support

Question

Linux support

Closed this issue 9 years ago · 27 comments

I'd love to play with this tool on Linux. Is any porting planned? What would be the main challenges for a port (I imagine the GUI toolkit being the likely biggest -- only? -- issue)?

swisspol commented 8 years ago

😉

Answer 1 · 2016-06-04T13:25:45.000Z

GitUp is pretty much a 100% Mac app and is not portable. A complete rewrite is needed for another platform.

Answer 2 · 2016-09-10T22:23:34.000Z

How about GNUstep? Is it possible to compile GitUp using it?

Answer 3 · 2016-09-10T22:55:11.000Z

Someone could try but I doubt it.

Answer 4 · 2016-09-15T08:57:59.000Z

Hm, would the Electron platform help to make this a multi-platform tool?

Answer 5 · 2016-09-15T10:45:09.000Z

@brylie Electron apps are slow.

Answer 6 · 2016-09-15T11:11:05.000Z

@salutis is there a benchmark for reference? What parts are slow?

Answer 7 · 2016-09-15T11:30:35.000Z

@brylie JavaScript, HTML, and CSS add additional levels of abstraction.

Answer 8 · 2016-09-15T12:00:19.000Z

Electron is slow compared to native apps and they know it: electron/electron#5672. Most importantly, I cannot imagine how GitUp being an Obj-C app could be easily converted to a JS app.

Answer 9 · 2016-09-15T12:04:51.000Z

There are a lot of considerations when calling an application or framework slow.

This has much more to do with how individual Electron-based apps are written than it does Electron itself.
-- @mnquintana
electron/electron#5672 (comment)

you are assuming that the speed difference between native apps and Electron based apps is purely dependent on Electron itself. How the apps which run on Electron are designed and written has a huge impact on their performance.
@sedwards2009
electron/electron#5672 (comment)

Answer 10 · 2016-09-15T12:08:32.000Z

I am not trying to start a flame war here, as it was a simple suggestion for a multi-platform development framework. If there are some specific suggestions as to what parts of Electron are slow and how those parts would relate to GitUp, that might lead to a productive discussion.

GitUp looks really nice, and I think people would enjoy using it on other platforms.

By way of example, GitKraken, another Git GUI, is built with the Electron framework:
https://www.gitkraken.com/

GitKraken, however, is not open-source.

Answer 11 · 2016-09-15T13:16:38.000Z

GitUp is not your average Git client, which just display a table of recent commits with a few branches drawn next to it, and therefore could be written in pretty much any language and toolkit and have acceptable performance.

For GitUp to be able to load and render the topology of an entire repo of 50,000 commits in less than one second, and let you navigate around this fast, it has to be highly optimized across the entire stack.

Electron would mean an 100 MB app instead of 5 MB, 10X slower, a UI that breaks many OX conventions, and let's not forget, a vastly more complicated and slower build system and write-run-debug development loop.

Answer 12 · 2016-09-16T03:23:49.000Z

We are missing the point here. What might be a path towards cross-platform support?

Answer 13 · 2016-09-16T03:33:58.000Z

A rewrite.

Answer 14 · 2016-09-16T03:35:39.000Z

Point taken.

Answer 15 · 2016-09-16T07:17:55.000Z

What technologies would be worth considering for multi-platform compatibility?

For example, it may be of value to consider the web platform:

Answer 16 · 2017-02-01T22:00:04.000Z

@brylie most probably QT... I guess it's the only "viable" alternative.

Answer 17 · 2017-08-24T07:24:45.000Z

I found gitup through the interview @swisspol did with The Changelog, and I seem to remember that the app internally uses GitUpKit, which was meant to be a better git library.

I took a look at it and I presume that the super-cool features of GitUp, namely undo/redo and all sorts of tree manipulations, are implemented there. It is written in ObjC, but that is cross-platform, right? So it is only the commit display and the UI that would definitely require a rewrite?

Answer 18 · 2017-08-25T06:54:28.000Z

Actually, I'm wrong :) GitUpKit also includes a lot of view code. So, yes, a full rewrite…

Answer 19 · 2017-08-25T07:38:39.000Z

Yeah. Unsubscribing due to the fact that Linux support is not likely.

Answer 20 · 2017-08-25T16:20:04.000Z

Not necessarily a full rewrite. Apart from GNUstep, there is a GTK+ binding for Objective-C - GTKKit and IUP (a portable native GUI) binding for Cocoa - IupCocoa.
Another way is to convert Obj-C to Swift using e.g. Swiftify and use a GTK+ binding for Swift - SwiftGtk.
Any volunteers?

Answer 21 · 2021-11-10T18:00:08.000Z

Anyone know a tool for Linux that has gitup's reflog viewer / navigator type functionality? I miss it :(

Answer 22 · 2021-11-10T19:48:59.000Z

@astubbs no reflog viewer but ungit is the closest I found. I have a pr in progress on there where eventually I hope to incorporate some of gitups ideas.

I'm also using libgit2 but encountering weird issues with diffs sometimes.

Answer 23 · 2021-11-11T13:46:41.000Z

Hello there, some people talked about Electron, but I would like to suggest Tauri, which is a Rust-based alternative providing the same features but outputting small and fast apps.

Answer 24 · 2021-11-11T15:13:01.000Z

@KaKi87 getting very off-topic, but Tauri doesn't seem to include NodeJS, which would be necessary for many of these kinds of apps?

Answer 25 · 2021-11-11T20:52:50.000Z

No, because Tauri provides many APIs, including filesystem, shell and HTTP features, which should be enough to manipulate local and remote git repositories.

Answer 26 · 2021-12-02T16:54:54.000Z

Working on this over here if anyone is still interested: https://github.com/codymikol/git-down , slowly but surely making progress.