glimmerjs/glimmer-di

Issues

• Concept of service/access to container in Glimmer application?

  #44 opened a year ago by e00dan
  3

• Deserializing absolute paths should not requires a type

  #45 opened 7 years ago by mixonic
  0

• Proposal: Use opaque specifiers

  #24 opened 8 years ago by dgeb
  2

• Registry vs Resolver priority

  #43 opened 8 years ago by ef4
  6

• Proposal: Automatically create backing JS component

  #25 opened 8 years ago by asakusuma
  2

• prod builds produce source maps, but then uglify discards them

  #42 opened 8 years ago by stefanpenner
  1

• Babel error

  #27 opened 8 years ago by knownasilya
  11

• Proposal: Track instance registrations separate from factory registrations

  #21 opened 8 years ago by dgeb
  1

• Proposal: lookupAll(type)

  #32 opened 8 years ago by davewasmer
  0

• Factories lack documentation

  #31 opened 8 years ago by knownasilya
  0

• factoryFor return value should be {create, class}

  #20 opened 8 years ago by mixonic
  2

• Proposal: Remove registration options entirely

  #23 opened 8 years ago by dgeb
  3

• Proposal: Use specifier interface (instead of strings) throughout

  #22 opened 8 years ago by dgeb
  1

• Eliminate glimmer-engine dependency duplication.

  #1 opened 8 years ago by dgeb
  0

• Fix node 4

  #9 opened 8 years ago by dgeb
  1