Connect your plain guards, questions or abilities with Ember's DI system, the owner.
The successor to ember-can
.
- Ember.js v3.28 or above
- Embroider or ember-auto-import v2
ember install ember-ability
Let's say we want to put a link to registration, but only when the user is not
already logged in. We have an ability canRegister
, which is based on the
isAuthenticated
from session
service from
ember-simple-auth
:
const canRegister = ability(({ services }) => () => {
const { session } = services;
return !session.isAuthenticated;
});
<template>
{{#if (canRegister)}}
<LinkTo @route="registration">Register</LinkTo>
{{/if}}
</template>
Wait? The Owner
does not provide destructuring by default, what is happening
here? Since in an ability we are interesting in reading information, we can
utilize a read API of the owner, with syntactical sugar from
ember-sweet-owner
.
At best - and this is what ember-ability
is created for - is to connect an
existing business logic available in plain js/ts with Ember. In a blog
engine, we want to control editing of a blog post. As business logic is
considered to be pure, here is the relevant snippet:
// @my-blog/core
export interface User {
id: number;
givenName: string;
familyName: string;
admin: boolean;
}
export interface Post {
id: string;
author: User;
title: string;
content: string;
}
export function canEdit(post: Post, user: User) => {
return post.author.id === user.id || user.admin;
}
The canEdit
function controls whether this functionality is available to a
given user. Since this is plain typescript, this can be properly unit tested to
ensure business logic works as expected.
In an Ember world, the User
is available via service. Let's say as
currentUser
of the user
service. And we can use the above function like so:
import Component from '@glimmer/component';
import UserService from '@my-blog/ember-app/services/user';
import { canEdit } from '@my-blog/core';
export default class AppNavigation extends Component {
@service declare user: UserService;
<template>
{{#if (canEdit @post this.user.currentUser)}}
<LinkTo @route="post.edit" @model={{@post}}>Edit Post</LinkTo>
{{/if}}
</template>
}
But this is cumbersome, with the usage of ember-ability
, the API can be
reduced to a minimum:
import { canEdit as upstreamCanEdit} from '@my-blog/core';
import { ability } from 'ember-ability';
const canEdit = ability(({ services }) =>
(post: Post) => upstreamCanEdit(post, services.user.currentUser)
);
<template>
{{#if (canEdit @post)}}
<LinkTo @route="post.edit" @model={{@post}}>Edit Post</LinkTo>
{{/if}}
</template>
Code for the example is available in two packages:
@my-blog/core
- Contains the entire business logic + fixtures@my-blog/web-app
- The ember app withability()
As ember-ability
is the successor to embe-can
here is a practical guide to
migrate over`. This is a two step process, to properly plan tech debt tickets.
The guide focuses on the PostAbility
:
// app/abilities/post.ts
import { service } from '@ember/service';
import { Ability } from 'ember-can';
import UserService from '../services/user';
export default class PostAbility extends Ability {
@service declare user: UserService;
get canEdit() {
return this.user.currentUser.admin || this.model.author.id === this.user.currentUser.id;
}
}
As first step, extract the canEdit
accessor into its own function. At this
point you should consider creating a plain js/ts package, that holds your
business logic. A pure package has proven to be the best place. Type your Post
and User
objects. Move focus to the signature of your pure ability functions.
// @blog/core/post/abilities.ts
import type { Post } from '../post';
import type { User } from '../../user';
export function canEdit(post: Post, user: User) {
return user.admin || post.author.id === user.id;
}
Next step would be to create fixtures for User
and Post
. Don't use
fake-data. Record real traffic from your apps and store these payloads as
fixtures. With production-like fixtures, write unit tests for the function
above.
In a second effort use the unit-tested function in the PostAbility
// @blog/app/abilities/post.ts
import { service } from '@ember/service';
import { Ability } from 'ember-can';
import UserService from '../services/user';
+ import { canEdit } from '@blog/core/post/abilities';
export default class PostAbility extends Ability {
@service declare user: UserService;
get canEdit() {
- return this.user.currentUser.admin || this.model.author.id === this.user.currentUser.id;
+ return canEdit(this.model, this.user.currentUser);
}
}
When replacing an ember-can
ability class with many functions, these newly
created abilities can either live organized together in one module or folder,
for re-use in many locations - or locally on the component/route. Both
approaches will be explained in the following, also with the two ways to connect
them to your components: co-located templates and single file components.
When using co-located templates, the backing class will pipe the ability into the template. In this scenario, the ability is placed into its own module.
// app/abilities/post.ts
import { ability } from 'ember-ability';
import { canEdit as upstreamCanEdit } from '@blog/core/post/abilities';
export const canEdit = ability(({ services }) =>
(post: Post) => upstreamCanEdit(post, services.user.currentUser)
);
... and use the backing class to pipe the ability into the template...
import { canEdit } from 'app/abilities/post';
export class Post extends Component {
canEdit = canEdit;
}
... to use it in the template:
SFCs allow to keep things local in one file, let's do so:
import { ability } from 'ember-ability';
import { canEdit as upstreamCanEdit } from '@blog/core/post/abilities';
export const canEdit = ability(({ services }) =>
(post: Post) => upstreamCanEdit(post, services.user.currentUser)
);
<template>
...
{{#if (canEdit @post)}}
<LinkTo @route="post.edit" @model={{@post}}>Edit Post</LinkTo>
{{/if}}
</template>