Angular Firebase Role Authorization and Authentication
Based on https://github.com/mrgamer/angular-login-example
angular-login-example
Stand-alone project showing how to make a robust angular application serving access permissions from Server.
A new (polishing) release has been in work for the last months, differences are only in the demo app, not in the service.
- You can now add users in the demo, and they gets displayed in homepage.
- Style is way more polished, I hope you can find useful snippets out of it.
- Registration form provides a nice error feedback, you can dig into the code for the details.
- All the
ngMockrequests gets printed in the console!
- What this is example for
- Libraries Used
- loginService
- Logic behind
- How to generate correct errors
- Redirect handling
- How to declare a $state
$ git clone https://github.com/mrgamer/angular-login-example.git
$ cd angular-login-example
$ npm install && bower install && grunt
# Open browser on http://localhost:8080Clone the repo, and try declaring a new state with How to declare a state; altough i recommend reading some of the page in order to understand the implications of what you're doing!
This project is an example about how to build a very robust login system using AngularJS. It manages tokens for users to login, they can be managed customly server-side (server side is absent on this demo), you can make them expire/change permissions without worrying about leaving a non-consistant state on the client side.
PLEASE NOTE: this is an example because it's just a demostration, and can act as a starting point for your implementation, if you're looking for a library that gets login done in your AngularJS application in 5 minutes, this is not what this project is about!
Yes! There are other projects trying to cover authentication limitations of AngularJS vs server-side solutions, i would recommend fnakstad's project, and his blogposts. There is also another project about managing non-authorized http requests.
The main differences in fnakstad's implementation against this one, is that he serves a cookie upfront when serving the index.html page; this cookie has all the information needed regarding the user permissions.
I really didn't want to mess with cookies in my client-side code.
A note about cookies: they are handled in an "uncommon" way in ExpressJS, they are not "rolling-cookies", it's a clever implementation to me, but it's not what a php/.net developer expects (or your boss expects!).
Secondly, this works with a RESTful API service!
| functionality | my implementation | fnakstad's |
|---|---|---|
| Simplicity | ✖ | ✔ |
| No dependencies | ✖ | ✔ |
| Easier compatibility | ✖ | ✔ |
| No server changes | ✔ | ✖ |
| RESTful support | ✔ | ✖ |
| Handles errors | ✔ | ✖ |
| "hackish" | ✖ | ✔ |
| less code recursion | ✖ | ✔ |
In a decently-sized application user banning and authorization revocation might be an important of the login department.
Doing this using cookies it's tricky, ExpressJS or any other backend, usually doesn't give you direct access to the cookie Array.
The usual workaround is to write an userToken inside the cookie and then revoke that token, when revoked you have to clear the cookie.
As personal taste, i haven't found it particularly elegant, so a more radical/direct approach.
You should know this one :-) In this release the dev team has put routing in a separate file because there are alternative projects like...
This is the star here! After messing my life using libraries like backbone-layoutmanager, i can say this is a far more thinked solution, incredibly stable, and elegant solution to be only at version 0.2.0!
This part of AngularJS kit is made mainly for testing purposes, on this demo is used to simulate a backend server with 700ms response time.
The following properties are overridable at config time, injecting loginServiceProvider.
Example:
angular.module('myapp.module', [])
.config(function (loginServiceProvider) {
errorState = 'myapp.OriginalWayToError';
userToken = '9088mmmll18992jn';
});Default value is obtained through localStorage.getItem('userToken').
You can override this and use cookies, sqlite, anything custom works aswell (from URL? Ex: /somepath?userToken=XX992mm2Yy1m ).
It's a string, the name of a the default state that handles the $stateChangeError.
In the example, this state comes with a parameter in the URL, PLEASE NOTE that a state must have a parameter in the url, even if it the parameters gets passed by $state.go (and not writing them actually in the URL).
If the parameters are not "registered" in the url, they get filtered and never reach $stateParams.
It's a string, the name of the state the user gets redirected after the logoutUser() has been processed.
Function that gets called on the first initialization of the provider.
It reads the userToken, and if it's set, sets the $http headers.
Function called by the previous one, and by the next one.
It is a setter for $http.defaults.headers, nothing more.
Function that registers the user in the localStorage (in this implementation).
Then calls setHeaders, to make sure headers are coherent with the token given.
Function that gets called on the first initialization of the provider.
Registers the listeners on $stateChangeStart, $stateChangeSuccess, $stateChangeError, in order to manage permissions and error redirection.
Synchronous check on permissions, if the service already has the informations about the user (in short: if it's an anonymous user), authorize or denies it. Handles spinner appearance.
Handles spinner disappear.
Manages error redirection in case of any resolve fails, even the grandfather one.
Important function that gets called once the grandfather receives the informations from the server.
Arguments should be function (data, status, headers, config) the same as $http.success/$http.error
It updates loginService.user with the JSON (that should be) in the first argument.
This is the place where to put custom logic in case you don't have a server that gives you a correct userRole, you can generate it manually looking at other (custom) informations given by the server response.
Accepts as only argument an httpPromise, it's usually called from a controller, and simply calls the above loginHandler (for now).
Accepts as only argument an httpPromise, it redirects the user to the logoutState.
Function used in the grandfather resolve, it includes an asynchronous check on permissions.
Returns a $q promise that gets resolved in case the user can access the requested state, rejected otherwise.
This property might have 2 states: null, or a valid userRole from routing-config.js
This property gets updated by loginHandler, pay attention, this gets done using angular.extend.
Boolean property indicating if the user is logged with an userRole different than userRoles.anonymous, useful to display the user status in your AngularJS application.
Boolean property indicating if the loginService is waiting for the grandfather's resolve to be completed, in order to check if the user can or cannot access the requested state.
Boolean property, might have 3 states: null, false, true.
null: loginService hasn't done it's work yet.
false: loginService is waiting for some $http promise to get completed
true: loginService got answer from $http so the values must be considered final.
Should be handy for displaying loading spinners, as done on this example.
While this demostration has some code behind, the user checking problem in a Single-Page Application is actually more a logic problem (when to check permissions? how to get required informations?), instead of a coding-problem.
As you can see if you meddle with the code, the so-called grandfather is an abstract state that is the father of all the states.
The state logic in angular-ui-router is based off a N-ary state tree.
The root of this tree is the grandfather, being abstract only means it gets executed but cannot be transitioned into, exactly what we need check permissions asynchronously.
In the app there is a file so called routing-config.js completely taken from fnakstad project.
I think it's a clever and handy bit-based security system.
In this demo you can see there is a double check on user permissions to transition to a state:
The former is a synchronous check on all the $stateChangeStart events, this must be synchronous because events for their nature can only be prevented in a sync-way.
But since we need it to do a server-side request the first REAL check is done after an http request.
The latter is inside the resolvePendingstate method, called from the grandfather state in this example, just after it obtained the valid user informations to let the user access a state or not.
Here's a brief call schema of the app and the service, and how they interact with the user request.
Bare in mind this is for the user to get a general idea, the real amount of calls might be higher (or slightly different).
Custom errors can be generated in your own resolve(s), for example:
angular.module('myapp.module', [])
.config(function ($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state('app.somestate', {
url: '/random/url',
resolve: {
'resourceNeeded': function ($q) {
var strangeDeferred = $q.defer();
if (Math.random() * 10 > 5) {
strangeDeferred.resolve('you have been lucky');
} else {
if (Math.random() * 10 > 5) {
strangeDeferred.reject('not lucky enough');
} else {
strangeDeferred.reject('real bad luck');
}
}
return strangeDeferred.promise;
}
}
});
})Will generate a 'not lucky enough' || 'real bad luck' error, into the $stateChangeError handler.
The default behaviour is to redirect to errorState.
But if you want a redirect to a custom state, you just have to add this to the previous example:
angular.module('myapp.module', [])
.config(function ($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state('app.somestate', {
url: '/random/url',
resolve: '', /* previous resolve here */
redirectMap: {
'not lucky enough': { state: 'app.error', prefix: 'luck' },
'real bad luck': 'app.specialBadluck'
}
});
})IMPORTANT NOTE: if you decide to use the object version, prefix is not optional, if you don't want a prefix just use ''.
The object version is mostly in case there is a state that handles many errors, and you want to differentiate them, using a string prefix.
The string version is shorter and more usable, use what's more appropriate for you.
$http errors gets handled in a very similar way, the error is based on the statusCode converted to string given by the httpPromise.error.
Example:
angular.module('myapp.module', [])
.config(function ($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state('app.criticalState', {
url: '/random/url',
resolve: {
'httpRequestNeeded': function ($http) {
/* let's suppose the responding statusCode is 409 */
return $http.get('/whatever/url');
}
},
redirectMap: {
'409': { state: 'app.httpErrors', prefix: 'criticalState' }
}
});
});And in the app.httpErrors's state template:
<div ng-switch="$stateParams.error">
<p ng-switch-when="criticalState409">httpRequestNeeded has failed to complete, this is fail.</p>
<p ng-switch-when="409">Generic request responded with a 409.</p>
<p ng-switch-when="401">Unauthorized!</p>
<p ng-switch-default>Random HTTP Error occurred!</p>
</div ng-switch>This example using AngularJS 1.2.0rc1 doesn't have $routeProvider but angular-ui-router has $urlRouterProvider, as shown on app.js this is sufficient to declare redirects.
Use his very well written wiki to read howto
The correct way to declare a state for your application is to have it depend on app.grandfather.
Also the state needs to be called 'app.something', because the grandfather state is called 'app' in a way to be the father of any state.
For example a section of your single-page-application might be declared as funny.js:
angular.module('myapp.funny', ['myapp.grandfather'])
.config(function ($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state('app.funny', {
url: '/funny',
templateUrl: '/funny/funny.tpl.html',
controller: 'FunnyController',
resolve {
'getRandomFunnyFacts': function ($http) {
return $http.get('/funnygenerator');
}
},
redirectMap: {
'noFunFound': 'app.sadError'
}
});
})
.controller('FunnyController', function ($scope, getRandomFunnyFacts) {
/* suppose the getRandomFunnyFacts is a JSON Array, we'll get the latest added funny fact */
$scope.phrase = getRandomFunnyFacts.pop();
});