Evaluate the developer-friendliness and performance of various API frameworks by implementing the same example project.
Framework | Documentation | Configuration | Dependency Management | Routing | Input Validation | Database Handling | Error Handling | Authentication/Authorization | Serialization | Testing | Logging | Caching | HTTP Requests | Performance | Queue Handling | Websockets |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aiohttp | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Django | Docs | 8/10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Express | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Flask | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Gin | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Nest | Docs | 10/10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Next | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Phoenix | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Rails | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Rocket | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Spring | Docs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
We welcome contributions to the API Framework Comparison project. To contribute, please follow these guidelines:
- Fork the repository.
- Create a new branch for your feature or bug fix.
- Make your changes and ensure the code follows best practices.
- Write tests for your code when applicable.
- Submit a pull request, describing the changes you've made.
API Framework Comparison is licensed under the MIT License. You are free to use, modify, and distribute this project for personal and commercial use. For more details, please see the LICENSE file.