Glob style pattern matcher for strings in Java.
Most implementations for glob searching try to rewrite the glob as a regular expression. Although rewriting as a regular expression is possible, it is not trivial to get it correct as special care needs to be taken to escape any accidental regular expression commands (including any contained \Q and \E commands). In addition, most regular expression engines can easily get tripped up if the user enters a repeating match-zero-or-more character and a long string of non-matching text as, in greedy mode, the engine will do a lot of work to figure out that the pattern does not match.
This library is a direct implementation of a glob matcher and strives to be both safer and faster than rewriting the pattern as a regular expression.
A glob is a very basic type of pattern matching where you use a single
character to say "match anything or nothing". The Unix command line
supports this by using a * and SQL uses a %. Single character
matches are also supported using ? and _ respectively. Glob patterns
are no where near as expressive as full regular expressions.
Wikipedia has more information.
- Zero library dependencies (we depend on junit for testing and jmh for benchmarking, but the final artifact has no dependencies)
- Low memory footprint
- Compiled matchers are thread safe.
- 100% Junit Test Coverage
- Published JMH Benchmarks for comparision with regular expressions
Add as dependency:
implementation 'com.hrakaroo:glob:0.9.0'
Globs do not have any capture syntax (unlike regex) so the usage is even easier
than regex. The default compile uses * for the match anything character, ?
for the match one character, is case sensitive and handles escaping.
MatchingEngine m = GlobPattern.compile("dog*cat\\*goat??");
if (m.matches(str)) { ... }
This will match the following dog horse cat*goat!~ and dogcat*goat..
but not horse dogcat*goat. and not dog catgoat!/.
We can also change the glob characters so uses SQL LIKE syntax.
MatchingEngine m = GlobPattern.compile("dog%cat\%goat_", '%', '_', GlobPattern.HANDLE_ESCAPES);
if (m.matches(str)) { ... }
This will match the following dog horse cat%goat!~ and dogcat%goat..
but not horse dogcat%goat. and not dog catgoat!/.
You can also turn off either the anything or single character matching by using
\0 as your matching character.
Larger scores are better as they indicate more throughput per second. For both the globWords and globLogLines benchmarks the glob pattern has been written specifically to prevent the Glob library from using an optimization.
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Benchmark1.globWords thrpt 10 19.460 ± 0.967 ops/s
Benchmark1.greedyRegexWords thrpt 10 12.609 ± 0.339 ops/s
Benchmark1.nonGreedyRegexWords thrpt 10 13.291 ± 0.303 ops/s
For the words file the glob-library is 1.5x faster than both greedy and non-greedy regex.
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Benchmark1.globLogLines thrpt 10 10.707 ± 0.204 ops/s
Benchmark1.greedyRegexLogLines thrpt 10 8.598 ± 0.247 ops/s
Benchmark1.nonGreedyRegexLogLines thrpt 10 8.409 ± 0.162 ops/s
For the longer log lines the glob-library is still faster, but not by as much.
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Benchmark1.globCompare thrpt 10 179.345 ± 3.151 ops/s
Benchmark1.globCompareCaseInsensitive thrpt 10 169.957 ± 23.889 ops/s
Benchmark1.stringCompare thrpt 10 211.104 ± 3.435 ops/s
Benchmark1.stringCompareCaseInsensitive thrpt 10 126.214 ± 5.041 ops/s
For basic comparision the glob-library is slightly slower than a String.equals and slightly faster for a String.equalsIgnoreCase.
- Glob matching is non-greedy
- Multiple glob patterns are folded into one at compile time
- Automatic optimization uses a string comparision if no globs are found in the pattern
- Automatic optimization for other common patterns ('*foo', 'foo*', '*foo*', '*', '')
- Weighted towards front loading work to the pattern compiler
100% Test code coverage
Effort has been made to avoid recursion, nested loops and generics, all of which can have small performance impacts. Effort has also been made to avoid using external libraries (which is also why the library is written in java and not kotlin) so as to minimize dependency conflicts with other libraries.