ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip

Issues

• AUTH48: clarify frames per packet

  #184 opened a year ago
  1

• AUTH48: Use of "Fail the request"

  #180 opened a year ago
  3

• AUTH48: Use of Successful response

  #179 opened a year ago
  3

• AUTH48: Wrong use of HTTP Proxy

  #178 opened a year ago
  5

• Wording nit found during EDIT phase

  #175 opened a year ago
  1

• Treating differentiated services equally?

  #173 opened a year ago
  3

• Go through usage of client and server vs IP proxying endpoint

  #167 opened a year ago
  4

• Clarify that IPproto is a traffic filter parameter on the outermost IP header that is to be encapsulated by the tunnel

  #166 opened a year ago
  1

• Clarify the conceptual model of router vs link (Tunnel)

  #165 opened a year ago
  5

• Disabling congestion control a SHOULD?

  #164 opened a year ago
  3

• Mandate usage of HTTPS

  #163 opened a year ago
  2

• Clarify assumption in ECN considerations

  #159 opened a year ago
  0

• Text on disabling congestion control

  #152 opened a year ago
  17

• Editorial: in introduction mention why we update RFC 9298

  #146 opened a year ago
  0

• Editorial: add a Performance Considerations section

  #145 opened a year ago
  2

• Editorial: split handling out of HTTP Datagram Payload Format section

  #144 opened a year ago
  2

• Should there be an ADDRESS_RELEASE capsule?

  #143 opened a year ago
  5

• Missing bits in example

  #138 opened a year ago
  1

• ICMP packet location clarification

  #137 opened a year ago
  1

• Proxy capsule handling requirements

  #136 opened a year ago
  4

• Address use conditions

  #135 opened a year ago
  7

• Optional signal reminder

  #134 opened a year ago
  3

• Mention link-local

  #128 opened 2 years ago
  1

• Scoping and IPv6 extension headers

  #127 opened 2 years ago
  1

• List comments from Vinny

  #126 opened 2 years ago
  1

• How should the client deal with assigned addresses changing or getting removed?

  #121 opened 2 years ago
  2

• IP Address Range overlap prevention when IP Protocol is 0 vs non-0.

  #120 opened 2 years ago
  3

• Clarify the IPv6 MTU ping technique?

  #119 opened 2 years ago
  3

• IPv6 handling question...

  #114 opened 2 years ago
  11

• ICMP contradiction

  #113 opened 2 years ago
  8

• Dynamic updates to the target by the client

  #109 opened 2 years ago
  3

• Potential DoS vector via spamming ADDRESS_REQUEST

  #106 opened 2 years ago
  2

• s/lesser/less than

  #105 opened 2 years ago
  1

• Does the order of address requests in ADDRESS_REQUEST or address assigned's in ADDRESS_ASSIGN have semantics?

  #104 opened 2 years ago
  10

• No feedback for ADDRESS_REQUEST denied?

  #103 opened 2 years ago
  11

• What are the expectations for a receiver of capsules that break the MUSTs

  #102 opened 2 years ago
  5

• ipproto is in the range of 0-255 but capsules can only use 4 or 6

  #101 opened 2 years ago
  2

• Slightly ambiguous about how to process a request with a bad path

  #100 opened 2 years ago
  2

• Change the Capsule type values prior to publication

  #99 opened 2 years ago
  5

• No examples in section 4

  #98 opened 2 years ago
  3

• Lifetime of the IP tunnel

  #97 opened 2 years ago
  1

• How should we NAK an ADDRESS_REQUEST?

  #95 opened 2 years ago
  5

• Example inconsistencies

  #90 opened 2 years ago
  3

• Text on ICMP

  #82 opened 2 years ago
  5

• Well-known IANA registration

  #81 opened 2 years ago
  6

• Meaning of zero request address blocks in REQUEST_ADDRESS Capsule

  #80 opened 2 years ago
  0

• Meaning of a second IP ADDRESS_ASSIGN capsule

  #79 opened 2 years ago
  1

• Address Capsules are insufficiently specified

  #78 opened 2 years ago
  0

• Inconsistent specification of allowed values for "target" variable

  #77 opened 2 years ago
  3

• Add URL reference for "Assigned Internet Protocol Numbers" IANA registry.

  #76 opened 2 years ago
  0