Issues
- 1
AUTH48: clarify frames per packet
#184 opened - 3
AUTH48: Use of "Fail the request"
#180 opened - 3
AUTH48: Use of Successful response
#179 opened - 5
AUTH48: Wrong use of HTTP Proxy
#178 opened - 1
Wording nit found during EDIT phase
#175 opened - 3
Treating differentiated services equally?
#173 opened - 4
- 1
- 5
- 3
Disabling congestion control a SHOULD?
#164 opened - 2
Mandate usage of HTTPS
#163 opened - 0
Clarify assumption in ECN considerations
#159 opened - 17
Text on disabling congestion control
#152 opened - 0
- 2
- 2
- 5
Should there be an ADDRESS_RELEASE capsule?
#143 opened - 1
Missing bits in example
#138 opened - 1
ICMP packet location clarification
#137 opened - 4
Proxy capsule handling requirements
#136 opened - 7
Address use conditions
#135 opened - 3
Optional signal reminder
#134 opened - 1
Mention link-local
#128 opened - 1
Scoping and IPv6 extension headers
#127 opened - 1
List comments from Vinny
#126 opened - 2
- 3
- 3
Clarify the IPv6 MTU ping technique?
#119 opened - 11
IPv6 handling question...
#114 opened - 8
ICMP contradiction
#113 opened - 3
Dynamic updates to the target by the client
#109 opened - 2
- 1
s/lesser/less than
#105 opened - 10
- 11
No feedback for ADDRESS_REQUEST denied?
#103 opened - 5
- 2
- 2
- 5
- 3
No examples in section 4
#98 opened - 1
Lifetime of the IP tunnel
#97 opened - 5
How should we NAK an ADDRESS_REQUEST?
#95 opened - 3
Example inconsistencies
#90 opened - 5
Text on ICMP
#82 opened - 6
Well-known IANA registration
#81 opened - 0
- 1
- 0
- 3
- 0