Handle example data for CRAN
nikolas-burkoff opened this issue · 5 comments
nikolas-burkoff commented
- Do we want the package to be called scda.2022 or something else
- The size of the package gets big quickly which makes
R CND check --as-cran
not happy - though see insightsengineering/scda#98
- Users just want the example data they have to work with the example code, they are not interested in archives of old data - that's only useful for test cases
- It may make sense for the data to end up in scda itself which would simplify some things...
Also consider insightsengineering/scda.2021#91
shajoezhu commented
I thought cran does not take data packages? Please correct me if I was wrong
nikolas-burkoff commented
hmm - if it doesn't then we can't submit any package which uses the data package (even in suggests)?
shajoezhu commented
Hi @nikolas-burkoff , yea, I think we will need to discuss about the releasing plan. From a recent conversation, i think we can push to bioconductor, which is ok for the other packages have scda to be a suggested package.
Melkiades commented
So the plan is to push only scda to bioconductor? Is it not complaining there? I think their checks are stricter than cran's
shajoezhu commented
I think we can close this issue now. As scda* families are now being decoupled from tern, we will not release scda to cran