janestreet/ppx_sexp_conv
Generation of S-expression conversion functions from type definitions
OCamlMIT
Issues
- 4
Recursive types break codegen
#40 opened by mbacarella - 1
- 0
[ERROR] The compilation of ppx_sexp_conv.v0.16~preview.126.09+332 failed at "dune build -p ppx_sexp_conv -j 11".
#39 opened by denis631 - 1
Suggestion: [@sexp.unboxed]
#36 opened by hackwaly - 1
Redirecting to a polymorphic field?
#38 opened by cmxog - 3
- 5
Doesn't work with explicit transitive deps
#33 opened by mimoo - 2
Open variant error
#28 opened by Pitometsu - 6
Fewer parens
#27 opened by copy - 3
- 6
README: How to print as sexps in utop?
#23 opened by mars0i - 9
#require doesn't work in toplevel
#30 opened by yminsky - 1
sexp grammar?
#29 opened by chetmurthy - 7
OPAM description doesn't mention ppx_deriving
#24 opened by mars0i - 6
Missing dependency?
#21 opened by smondet - 3
allow "-" in variant definition
#18 opened by abate - 5
- 11
- 3
Not obvious how to run tests
#12 opened by infinity0 - 9
Doesn't work for exceptions
#11 opened by infinity0 - 3
GADT support
#8 opened by ejgallego - 6
Support for types with constraints
#6 opened by ejgallego - 6
overloaded constructor names cause failure
#10 opened by agarwal - 5
Attribute format for sexp_opaque
#26 opened by peblair - 2
runtime dependency on base
#22 opened by hannesm - 4
- 3
`Sexpable` and Polymorphic variants
#19 opened by SaswatPadhi - 6
- 0
Doesn't compile on trunk
#2 opened by samoht - 1
type aliasing deriving is incomplete
#3 opened by ivg - 1
Doesn't work with `Int64.t`
#5 opened by rgrinberg - 7
Support inline records of OCaml 4.03?
#9 opened by liweijian - 8
- 4
Crash on `#require "ppx_sexp_conv"`
#7 opened by liweijian - 13