return needed
Opened this issue · 3 comments
Your first usage example has a return but the second one does not. That made all the difference for me. Without the return the rsync would not work. So maybe you can update your second usage example so that it has a return.
G'day,
That's a good point. We will modify it ASAP. Cheers for that.
Eki
On 18 Nov 2016 5:25 AM, "Carlton Joseph" notifications@github.com wrote:
Your first usage example has a return but the second one does not. That
made all the difference for me. Without the return the rsync would not
work. So maybe you can update your second usage example so that it has a
return.—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#44, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAaTwRUB5MPkdZy-hW3Z-80WfR5vyUgMks5q_JwUgaJpZM4K1pLO
.
Huge bump. Had no idea this return stated was needed in gulp.
Can anyone explain why this is? I get how not returning properly can mess up Gulp's default task ordering, but I don't understand why this wouldn't actually execute the rsync function.