License
scunningham opened this issue · 5 comments
Possible for the author(s) to include an open source license in the repository?
Also, a tag would be helpful to help track progress, particularly in relation to releases of protobuf.
What kind of license would you recommend? I really don't have a preference of my own.
Also, there is really not any active development being done on this project. I'm happy to accept patches, but I don't have the possibility of tracking protobuf development actively.
Understand on the dev. It is useful though, which we appreciate.
On the license, I'd suggest same as protobuf, BSD-3 Clause:
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
We'd have to be able to accommodate that license to use it anyhow.
Thanks!
Sean
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jesper Eskilson
notifications@github.comwrote:
Also, there is really not any active development being done on this
project. I'm happy to accept patches, but I don't have the possibility of
tracking protobuf development actively.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/6#issuecomment-40404463
.
Or even better, completely free license allowing duplication of code
without attribution ;)
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Sean Cunningham
cunningham.sean@gmail.comwrote:
Understand on the dev. It is useful though, which we appreciate.
On the license, I'd suggest same as protobuf, BSD-3 Clause:
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
We'd have to be able to accommodate that license to use it anyhow.
Thanks!
SeanOn Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jesper Eskilson <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Also, there is really not any active development being done on this
project. I'm happy to accept patches, but I don't have the possibility of
tracking protobuf development actively.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/6#issuecomment-40404463
.
Ok, I've added a LICENSE file with the 3-clause BSD license from http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.