GAPIT.Association.GWAS.results
9437951970 opened this issue · 4 comments
9437951970 commented
I am getting same result using "MLM","CMLM", "MLMM","Enriched CMLM" model. In GAPIT there are total 10 models. Is there any scenario, when the above mentioned models give same result in GWAS.
jiabowang commented
No. Could you please send your data to me? So I can help to figure the reason.
9437951970 commented
Dear sir, please find the attached data files. I have got the same result
for *MLM* and *ECMLM *in GWAS association results file .
Regards
Ashis
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
*Ashis Ranjan Udgata*
Scientist, Social Science division,
ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulse Research,
Kalyanpur, Kanpur (UP), India, 208024
“SAVE TREE - Please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.”
[image: Mailtrack]
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&>
Sender
notified by
Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&>
03/01/24,
09:40:49 AM
…On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 8:33 AM Jiabo Wang ***@***.***> wrote:
No. Could you please send your data to me? So I can help to figure the
reason.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#100 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRNKXJEXNPZOWCMJQNU6FDYV7VY7AVCNFSM6AAAAABBFFGPHGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZSGM4DMNJWGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
jiabowang commented
That may be reasonable. The compress does not work for some conditions, and the number of individuals was optimum for compress groups.
9437951970 commented
Thank you for your quick response.
Regards
Ashis
*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
*Ashis Ranjan Udgata*
Scientist, Social Science division,
ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulse Research,
Kalyanpur, Kanpur (UP), India, 208024
“SAVE TREE - Please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.”
[image: Mailtrack]
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&>
Sender
notified by
Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality11&>
03/01/24,
11:26:40 AM
…On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:58 AM Jiabo Wang ***@***.***> wrote:
That may be reasonable. The compress does not work for some conditions,
and the number of individuals was optimum for compress groups.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#100 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRNKXOFBKKNDW6DEBN7G4TYWAGXBAVCNFSM6AAAAABBFFGPHGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZSGUZTMMJWGE>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>