JMESPath Enhancement Proposals

The JMESPath Enhancement Proposals (JEP) process is used to modify the JMESPath language and specification. There are implementations of JMESPath in over 10 languages, and this process ensures stakeholders and community members have the opportunity to review and provide feedback before it's officially part of the specification.

You can see the list of accepted JEPs at:

https://jmespath.github.io/jmespath.jep/

Things that need a JEP

Any functional change that would require an update to the specification requires a JEP.

This includes, but is not limited to:

New syntax
New functions
New semantics

You can review the existing JEPs in this repo to get a sense of the type of changes that require a JEP.

Things that do not need a JEP

Anything that is specific to a JMESPath library does not need a JEP. You should defer to the specific library's contributing guide. This can include additional language specific APIs, extension points (e.g. adding custom functions), configuration options, etc.

Guidelines for proposing new features

First, make sure that the feature has not been previously proposed. If it has, make sure to reference prior proposals and explain why this new proposal should be considered despite similar proposals not being accepted.

Writing a JEP can be a lot of work, so it can help to get initial guidance before going too far. A well thought out, high quality JEP helps its chance of acceptance and helps ensure a productive review process.

Before writing a JEP, you can create an issue for initial high level feedback in order to get a sense of the likelihood of a JEP being accepted. You can also use that issue to gauge interest in the feature.

The JEP Process

Fork this repository.
Copy 0000-jep-template.md to proposals/0000-feature-name.md, where feature-name is a high level descriptive name of the proposal. You don't need to add a JEP number, one will be assigned during the review process.
Fill in all sections of the JEP template. Be mindful of the "Motivation" and "Rationale" sections. These are an important part of driving consensus for a JEP.
Submit a pull request to this repo.
The JEP will be reviewed and feedback will be provided. Proposals often go through several rounds of feedback, this is a normal and expected part of the process.
As you incorporate feedback, do not rebase your commits. This ensures the history and evolution of the proposal remains visible.
The discussions will eventually stabilize to one of several states:
- The JEP has consensus for both the functionality and the proposed specification and is ready to be accepted.
- The JEP has consensus for the feature but there is not consensus with the specification.
- The JEP does not have consensus for the feature.
- The JEP loses steam and the discussions go stale. This will result in the PR being closed, but is subject to being reopened by anyone that wants to continue working on the JEP.
Once the JEP is approved by the JMESPath core team the pull request will be merged and the JEP will be assigned a number.
The relevant parts of the "Specification" section will be added to the JMESPath specification, and the tests cases from the "Test Cases" section of the JEP will be added to the jmespath.test repo.
JMESPath libraries can now implement the accepted JEP.

Tenets of JMESPath

When proposing new features, keep these tenets in mind. Adhering to these tenets gives your proposal a higher likelihood of being accepted: